BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
European Court of Human Rights |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> European Court of Human Rights >> Pawel PRZEGALINSKI v Poland - 36627/10 [2011] ECHR 1008 (31 May 2011) URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2011/1008.html Cite as: [2011] ECHR 1008 |
||
[New search] [Contents list] [Printable RTF version] [Help]
FOURTH SECTION
DECISION
Application no.
36627/10
by Paweł PRZEGALIŃSKI
against Poland
The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 31 May 2011 as a Committee composed of:
Zdravka
Kalaydjieva,
President,
Lech
Garlicki,
Vincent
A. De Gaetano,
judges,
and
Fatoş Aracı, Deputy
Section Registrar,
Having regard to the above application lodged on 24 June 2010,
Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the case,
Having deliberated, decides as follows:
PROCEDURE
The applicant, Mr Paweł Przegaliński, is a Polish national who was born in 1971 and lives in Kraków. The Polish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr J. Wołąsiewicz of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
On 7 October 2010 the President of the Fourth Section of the Court decided to communicate the applicant’s complaint under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the length of the investigation which commenced on 28 May 2002 and is still pending.
THE LAW
On 2 March 2011 the Court received the following declaration from the Government:
“ I, Jakub Wołąsiewicz, Agent of the Polish Government, declare that the Government of Poland offer to pay Mr Paweł Przegaliński, with a view to securing a friendly settlement of the above-mentioned case pending before the European Court of Human Rights, PLN 16,000 (sixteen thousand Polish zlotys), plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicant.
This sum will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the decision by the Court pursuant to Article 37 § 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights. In the event of failure to pay this sum within the said three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on it, from expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the case. ”
On 10 March 2011 the Court received the following declaration signed by the applicant:
“ I, Paweł Przegaliński, note that the Government of Poland are prepared to pay me, with a view to securing a friendly settlement of the above mentioned case pending before the European Court of Human Rights, the sum of PLN 16,000 (sixteen thousand Polish zlotys), plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicant.
This sum will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the decision by the Court pursuant to Article 37 § 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights. From the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amount at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
I accept the proposal and waive any further claims against Poland in respect of the facts giving rise to this application. I declare that this constitutes a final resolution of the case. ”
The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the application (Article 37 § 1 in fine of the Convention). In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list.
For these reasons, the Court unanimously
Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.
Fatoş Aracı Zdravka Kalaydjieva
Deputy
Registrar President