[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]
	European Court of Human Rights
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> European Court of Human Rights >> Turkey - unfairness of certain criminal proceedings - 7076/05 [2012] ECHR 2418 (14 September 2011) URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2011/2418.html Cite as: [2012] ECHR 2418

[New search] [Contents list] [Printable RTF version] [Help]

Resolution CM/ResDH(2011)170¹

Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights

in three cases against Turkey concerning the unfairness of certain criminal proceedings

(See details in Appendix)

The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”);

Having regard to the judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee once they had become final;

Recalling that the violations of the Convention found by the Court in these cases concern the unfairness of certain criminal proceedings due to the failure to hold hearings in cases in which the applicants were ordered to pay small fines by “sentence orders” adopted on the basis of an examination of the file (violations of Article 6, paragraph 1) (see details in Appendix);

Having invited the government of the respondent state to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with its obligation under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention to abide by the judgments;

Having examined the information provided by the government in accordance with the Committee’s Rules for the application of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention;

Having satisfied itself that the respondent state paid the applicants the just satisfaction provided in the judgments (see details in Appendix),

Recalling that a finding of violations by the Court requires, over and above the payment of just satisfaction awarded in the judgments, the adoption by the respondent state, where appropriate, of

- individual measures to put an end to the violations and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum; and

- general measures preventing similar violations;

DECLARES, having examined the measures taken by the respondent state (see Appendix) that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases and

DECIDES to close the examination of these cases.

Appendix to Resolution CM/ResDH(2011)170

Information on the measures taken to comply with the judgments in three cases against Turkey concerning the unfairness of certain criminal proceedings

Introductory case summary

These cases relate to the unfairness of certain criminal proceedings due to the failure to hold hearings in cases in which the applicants were ordered to pay small fines by “sentence orders” adopted on the basis of an examination of the file (violations of Article 6§1).

I. Payments of just satisfaction and individual measures

a) Details of just satisfaction

b) Individual measures

The Turkish authorities considered that no individual measures are required apart from the payment of just satisfaction in these cases for the following reasons: the applicants were ordered to pay insignificant amounts in fines in the proceedings during which they were deprived of their right to have a hearing. The violations found are not therefore based on procedural errors or shortcomings of such a gravity that a serious doubt is cast on the outcome of domestic procedures, within the meaning of the Recommendation Rec(2000)2 on the re-examination of reopening of certain cases at domestic level following judgments of the European Court of Human Rights.

Consequently, no other individual measure was considered necessary by the Committee of Ministers.

II. General measures

The new Code of Criminal Procedure, which came into force in June 2005, contains no provision on “sentence orders”. In these circumstances, no further general measure appears necessary (see Resolution CM/ResDH(2010)64 adopted in the case of Adem Arslan and other similar cases).

III. Conclusions of the respondent state

The government considers that no individual measure is required apart from the payment of the just satisfaction, that the general measures adopted will prevent similar violations and that Turkey has thus complied with its obligations under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention.