BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
European Court of Human Rights |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> European Court of Human Rights >> Przemyslaw Miroslaw BOGUSLAWSKI VEL DOBROSLAWSKI v Poland - 48986/10 [2012] ECHR 791 (17 April 2012) URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2012/791.html Cite as: [2012] ECHR 791 |
[New search] [Contents list] [Printable RTF version] [Help]
FOURTH SECTION
DECISION
Application no.
48986/10
Przemyslaw Miroslaw BOGUSŁAWSKI VEL
DOBROSŁAWSKI
against Poland
The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 11 April 2012 as a Committee composed of:
David
Thór Björgvinsson,
President,
Nebojša
Vučinić,
Vincent
A. De Gaetano,
judges,
and
Fatoş Aracı, Deputy
Section Registrar,
Having regard to the above application lodged on 11 August 2010,
Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the case,
Having deliberated, decides as follows:
PROCEDURE
The applicant, Mr Przemysław Mirosław Bogusławski vel Dobrosławski, is a Polish national who was born in 1985 and lives in Łódź. The Polish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr J. Wołąsiewicz of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
The applicant complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention about the length of civil proceedings which had commenced on 31 May 2007 at the latest and had ended on 15 February 2011.
THE LAW
On 8 February 2012 the Court received the following declaration signed by the applicant:
“I, Przemysław Mirosław Bogusławski Vel Dobrosławski, note that the Government of Poland are prepared to pay me, with a view to securing a friendly settlement of the above mentioned case pending before the European Court of Human Rights, PLN 6,800 (six thousand eight hundred Polish zlotys) to cover any and all pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage as well as costs and expenses, plus any tax that may be chargeable to me.
This sum will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the decision by the Court pursuant to Article 37 § 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights. From the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amount at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
I accept the proposal and waive any further claims against Poland in respect of the facts giving rise to this application. I declare that this constitutes a final resolution of the case.”
On 8 March 2012 the Court received the following declaration from the Government:
“I, Jakub Wołąsiewicz, Agent of the Government, declare that the Government of Poland offer to pay Mr Przemysław Mirosław Bogusławski Vel Dobrosławski, with a view to securing a friendly settlement of the above-mentioned case pending before the European Court of Human Rights, PLN 6,800 (six thousand eight hundred Polish zlotys) to cover any and all pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage as well as costs and expenses, plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicant.
This sum will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the decision by the Court pursuant to Article 37 § 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights. In the event of failure to pay this sum within the said three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on it, from expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the case.”
The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the application (Article 37 § 1 in fine of the Convention). In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list.
For these reasons, the Court unanimously
Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.
Fatoş Aracı David Thór Björgvinsson
Deputy
Registrar President