BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

    No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
    Thank you very much for your support!



    BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

    European Court of Human Rights


    You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> European Court of Human Rights >> Uktam TURDYYEV v Ukraine - 37738/05 [2012] ECHR 942 (22 May 2012)
    URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2012/942.html
    Cite as: [2012] ECHR 942

    [New search] [Contents list] [Printable RTF version] [Help]




    FIFTH SECTION

    DECISION

    Application no. 37738/05
    Uktam TURDYYEV against Ukraine
    and 3 other applications
    (see list appended)

    The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 22 May 2012as a Committee composed of:

    Mark Villiger, President,
    Karel Jungwiert,
    André Potocki, judges,
    and Stephen Phillips, Deputy Section Registrar,

    Having regard to the above applications lodged on various dates,

    Having deliberated, decides as follows:

    THE FACTS

    The applications were lodged by three Ukrainian nationals and one legal entity registered in Ukraine; their details are specified in the table attached below. The Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms Valeria Lutkovska, of the Ministry of Justice.

    The applicants complained about the delayed enforcement of domestic judgments given in their favour. These complaints were communicated to the Government, who submitted unilateral declarations to settle the cases. The declarations were forwarded to the applicants, who were invited to submit their comments. No replies followed.

    By registered letters sent on 22 September, 4 and 5 November 2011, the applicants were warned that their applications might be struck out of the Court’s list of cases pursuant to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention. No replies followed either.

    THE LAW

  1. The Court considers that the applications should be joined, given their common legal and factual background.
  2. It further considers that, in these circumstances, the applicants may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue their applications, within the meaning of Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention. Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in fine, the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols which require the continued examination of the cases.
  3. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list.

    For these reasons, the Court unanimously

    Decides to join the applications and to strike them out of its list of cases.

    Stephen Phillips Mark Villiger
    Deputy Registrar President

    Appendix

    No.

    Application no./

    Applicant’s name and date of birth

    Date of introduction

    1.

    37738/05

    TURDYYEV,

    Uktam, 1938

    5 October 2005

    2.

    14275/07

    ZENCHENKO,

    Tayisiya Ivanivna, 1940

    13 February 2007

    3.

    14456/07

    UKRAYINSKIY OBYEDINENNYY KAPITAL, ZAO

    23 March 2007

    4.

    27377/07

    GRYTSENKO,

    Ivan Ivanovych, 1939

    11 June 2007


     



BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2012/942.html