BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
European Court of Human Rights |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> European Court of Human Rights >> TURLEA AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA - 25480/15 (Judgment : Article 3 - Prohibition of torture : Fourth Section Committee) [2019] ECHR 349 (16 May 2019) URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2019/349.html Cite as: [2019] ECHR 349 |
[New search] [Contents list] [Help]
FOURTH SECTION
CASE OF ŢURLEA AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
( Application s no s . 25480/15and 9 other application s - see appended list )
JUDGMENT
STRASBOURG
16 May 2019
This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
In the case of Ţurlea and Others v. Romania ,
The European Court of Human Rights ( Fourth Section ), sitting as a Committee composed of:
Georges
Ravarani
,
President,
Marko
Bošnjak
,
Péter
Paczolay
,
judges
,
and
Liv
Tigerstedt
Acting
Deputy Section Registrar
,
THE FACTS
3. The list of applicant s and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table. 4. The applicant s complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention .THE LAW
I. JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS
5. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.II. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 3 OF THE CONVENTION
6. The applicant s complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention. They relied on Article 3 of the Convention, which reads as follows:Article 3
"No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment."
7. The Court notes that the applicant s were kept in detention in poor conditions. The details of the applicant s ' detention are indicated in the appended table. The Court refers to the principles established in its case - law regarding inadequate conditions of detention (see, for instance, Muršić v. Croatia [GC], no. 7334/13, §§ 96 - 101, ECHR 2016). It reiterates in particular that a serious lack of space in a prison cell weighs heavily as a factor to be taken into account for the purpose of establishing whether the detention conditions described are "degrading" from the point of view of Article 3 and may disclose a violation, both alone or taken together with other shortcomings (see Muršić , cited above, §§ 122 - 141, and Ananyev and Others v. Russia , nos. 42525/07and 60800/08, §§ 149 - 159, 10 January 2012). 8. In the leading case of Rezmiveș and Others v. Romania, nos. 61467/12and 3 others, 25 April 2017, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 9. Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion on the admissibility and merits of these applications. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the applicant s ' conditions of detention were inadequate. 10. These applications are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 3 of the Convention.IV. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION
11. Article 41 of the Convention provides:"If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made, the Court shall, if necessary, afford just satisfaction to the injured party."
12. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case - law (see, in particular, Rezmiveș and Others v. Romania, nos. 61467/12and 3 others, 25 April 2017), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sum s indicated in the appended table. 13. The Court considers it appropriate that the default interest rate should be based on the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank, to which should be added three percentage points.FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT , UNANIMOUSLY,
1. Decides to join the applications;
2. Declares the applications admissible;
3. Holds that these applications disclose a breach of Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention ;
4. Holds
(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicant s , within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;
(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
Done in English, and notified in writing on 16 May 2019 , pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.
Liv Tigerstedt Georges Ravarani
Acting D eputy Registrar President
APPENDIX
List of applications
raising complaints under Article
3
of the
Convention
(
inadequate conditions of detention
)
Application no. Date of introduction |
Applicant ' s name Date of birth |
Facility Start and end date Duration |
Sq. m. per inmate |
Specific grievances |
Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros) [1] | |
|
16/06/2015 |
Ștefan Ţurlea 01/01/1963 |
Ia ş i Prison 28/05/2009 to 01/06/2014 5 years and 5 days
Tulcea Prison 01/06/2014 to 30/11/2014 6 months
Rahova Prison 01/12/2014 to 01/03/2015 3 months and 1 day
Vaslui Prison 01/03/2015 pending More than 4 years and 20 days |
1.26 -1.98 m²
1.81-1.95 m²
1.95-2.79 m²
1.95 m² |
Overcrowding, lack or inadequate hygienic facilities, no or restricted access to shower, lack of or inadequate furniture
Overcrowding, lack of or inadequate furniture
Overcrowding, lack of or inadequate furniture
Overcrowding, lack of or inadequate furniture |
5,000 |
|
26/10/2015 |
Ion Mitu 12/04/1981 |
Oradea, Poarta Alb ă , Tulcea , Slobozia and Rahova Prisons 28/08/2008 pending More than 10 years , 6 months and 21 days |
1,76-2.09 m² |
O vercrowding, bunk beds, inadequate temperature, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, lack of fresh air, lack of or insufficient electric light, lack or insufficient quantity of food, mouldy or dirty cell, no or restricted access to shower, no or restricted access to warm water |
5,000 |
|
05/11/2015 |
Joszef Hendre 08/03/1970
Represented by Augustin- Viorel Ţigan , Ceica |
Oradea Prison 22/06/2012 to 16/10/2013 1 year , 3 months and 25 days
Satu Mare Prison 16/10/2013 pending More than 5 years , 5 months and 5 days
|
1.9-2.88 m²
0.7-1.1 m² |
O vercrowding, lack or inadequate hygienic facilities, no or restricted access to warm water, lack or insufficient natural light, lack of or inadequate furniture, lack or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air
O vercrowding, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of or inadequate furniture, lack or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air
|
5,000 |
|
08/12/2015 |
Dan Perju 02/12/1961
Represented by Mirela-Olimpia Pușcă , Bârlad |
B â rlad Police, Vaslui Police, Vaslui, Jilava and Ia ş i Prisons 22/08/2000 pending More than 18 years , 6 months and 27 days |
1.28-1.89 m² |
B â rlad Police and Vaslui Police: overcrowding, mouldy or dirty cell, lack or insufficient electric light, lack of fresh air, no or restricted access to toilet, lack of or inadequate furniture, no or restricted access to shower, poor quality of food Vaslui Prison: overcrowding, insufficient number of sleeping places, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of or inadequate furniture, no or restricted access to shower, heavy smells from the chicken factory nearby, poor quality of food Jilava and Ia ş i Prisons: overcrowding, insufficient number of sleeping places, lack of privacy for toilet, no or restricted access to shower, lack of or inadequate furniture, poor quality of food
|
5,000 |
|
11/12/2015 |
Florian Ovidiu Gergely 19/08/1980 |
Miercurea Ciuc Prison 14/08/2014 pending More than 4 years , 7 months and 7 days |
2.05-2.54 m² |
O vercrowding, lack of fresh air, lack of or insufficient natural light, mouldy or dirty cells, lack of or inadequate furniture, poor quality of food, bunk beds, lack or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air |
3,000 |
|
02/02/2016 |
Florinel-Mircea Partin 14/06/1986 |
Miercurea Ciuc Prison 31/05/2012 pending More than 6 years , 9 months and 21 days |
1.52-2.08 m² |
O vercrowding, bunk beds, lack of or insufficient natural light, poor quality of food, lack of or insufficient furniture, lack or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air |
5,000 |
|
09/05/2016 |
Mădălin Vasile 02/02/1983 |
Poarta Alb ă Prison 09/02/2015 pending More than 4 years , 1 month and 12 days |
1.51-2.72 m² |
O vercrowding, bunk beds, insufficient number of sleeping places, l ack of or inadequate furniture, poor quality of food, lack of or insufficient hygienic facilities |
3,000 |
|
31/03/2016 |
Costel Crețu 02/04/1957 |
Jilava Prison 11/12/2014 pending More than 4 years , 3 months and 10 days |
1.52-2.34 m² |
O vercrowding, lack of or inadequate furniture, lack of or insufficient fresh air, lack of or insufficient electric light, poor quality of potable water, poor quality of food |
3,000 |
|
13/06/2016 |
Gyula Kaszoni 13/05/1962
Represented by Dan Alberto Pop, Cluj-Napoca |
Gherla Prison 21/01/2016 pending More than 3 years and 2 months |
1.98-2.94 m² |
O vercrowding, bunk beds, lack of or insufficient hygienic facilities, poor quality of food |
3,000 |
|
07/10/2016 |
Titel Antohe 09/07/1980
Represented by Ionela Mărgărit , Bucharest |
Br ă ila Prison 18/12/2015 pending More than 3 years , 3 months and 3 days |
1.59-2.29 m² |
O vercrowding, lack of or insufficient hygienic facilities, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of or inadequate furniture, lack of or insufficient fresh air, lack of or insufficient electric light, poor quality of food, lack or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air |
3,000 |
[1] . Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.