 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
European Court of Human Rights |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> European Court of Human Rights >> MILKOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA - 3316/19 (Judgment : Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association : Fifth Section Committee) [2023] ECHR 464 (08 June 2023) URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2023/464.html Cite as: ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0608JUD000331619, [2023] ECHR 464, CE:ECHR:2023:0608JUD000331619 |
||
[New search] [Contents list] [Help]
FIFTH SECTION
CASE OF MILKOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
(Applications nos. 3316/19 and 46 others –
see appended list)
JUDGMENT
STRASBOURG
8 June 2023
This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
In the case of Milkova and Others v. Russia,
The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
María Elósegui, President,
Mattias Guyomar,
Kateřina Šimáčková, judges,
and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having deliberated in private on 17 May 2023,
Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:
1. The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table.
2. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were given notice of the applications.
THE FACTS
3. The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.
4. The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of country-wide protests against retirement age hike organised by Aleksey Navalnyy on 9 September 2018. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
THE LAW
I. JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS
5. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.
II. JURISDICTION
6. The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§ 68‑73, 17 January 2023).
III. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 11 OF THE CONVENTION
7. The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 11 of the Convention.
8. The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of assembly (see Kudrevičius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and proportionality of interference with it (see Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, ECHR 2006‑XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v. Moldova, no. 33482/06, 31 March 2009).
9. In the leading cases of Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts); Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014; and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.
10. Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the interferences with the applicants’ freedom of assembly were not “necessary in a democratic society”.
11. These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention.
IV. OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW
12. Some applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible.
13. Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that these complaints also disclose violations of the Convention and its Protocols in the light of its findings in Butkevich v. Russia, no. 5865/07, §§ 63-65, 13 February 2018; Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 115-31, 10 April 2018; and Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; and Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences (“the CAO”).
V. remaining complaints
14. Some applicants also raised other further additional complaints under Articles 5 and 6 of the Convention concerning other aspects of their deprivation of liberty and fairness of the administrative-offence proceedings. In view of the findings in paragraphs 11 and 13 above, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints.
15. The Court has further examined the rest of the complaints raised by the applicants and considers that, in the light of all the material in its possession and in so far as the matters complained of are within its competence, these complaints either do not meet the admissibility criteria set out in Articles 34 and 35 of the Convention or do not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms enshrined in the Convention. It follows that this part of the applications must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 § 4 of the Convention.
VI. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION
16. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case‑law (see, in particular, Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 25809/17 and 14 others, § 22, 4 October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.
FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,
1. Decides to join the applications;
2. Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with the applicants’ complaints as they relate to facts that took place before 16 September 2022;
3. Declares the complaints under Article 11 of the Convention and the other complaints under the well-established case-law of the Court, as set out in the appended table, admissible, finds that there is no need to examine separately the remaining complaints under Articles 5 and 6 of the Convention, and declares the remainder of the applications inadmissible;
4. Holds that these applications disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention;
5. Holds that there has been a violation of the Convention as regards the other complaints raised under well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table);
6. Holds
(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;
(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
Done in English, and notified in writing on 8 June 2023, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.
Viktoriya Maradudina María Elósegui
Acting Deputy Registrar President
APPENDIX
List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention
(disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies)
|
Application no. Date of introduction |
Applicant’s name Year of birth
|
Representative’s name and location |
Location of the public event
|
Administrative charges |
Penalty |
Final domestic decision Court Name Date |
Other complaints under well-established case-law |
Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros) [1] | |
|
|
3316/19 29/12/2018 |
Olga Alekseyevna MILKOVA 1965 |
Bushmakov Aleksey Vladimirovich Yekaterinburg |
Yekaterinburg
|
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO |
fine of RUB 10,000 |
Sverdlovsk Regional Court 07/11/2018 |
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
|
3,500 |
|
|
5827/19 29/12/2018 |
Igor Vasilyevich MILKOV 1965 |
Bushmakov Aleksey Vladimirovich Yekaterinburg |
Yekaterinburg
|
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO |
fine of RUB 10,000 |
Sverdlovsk Regional Court 09/11/2018 |
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
|
3,500 |
|
|
6005/19 25/12/2018 |
Svetlana Ivanovna YEFIMOVICH 1940 |
Lepekhin Andrey Gennadyevich Chelyabinsk |
Chelyabinsk
|
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO |
fine of RUB 5,000 |
Chelyabinsk Regional Court 10/10/2018 |
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
|
3,500 |
|
|
6009/19 25/12/2018 |
Yuriy Sergeyevich SITNIKOV 1995 |
Lepekhin Andrey Gennadyevich Chelyabinsk |
Chelyabinsk
|
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO |
fine of RUB 10,000 |
Chelyabinsk Regional Court 25/10/2018 |
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
|
3,500 |
|
|
6014/19 25/12/2018 |
Viktor Viktorovich PARSHUKOV 1984 |
Lepekhin Andrey Gennadyevich Chelyabinsk |
Chelyabinsk
|
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO |
fine of RUB 5,000 |
Chelyabinsk Regional Court 25/10/2018 |
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. |
3,500 |
|
|
6017/19 25/12/2018 |
Yevgeniy Igorevich ZUBOV 1997 |
Lepekhin Andrey Gennadyevich Chelyabinsk |
Chelyabinsk
|
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO |
fine of RUB 15,000 |
Chelyabinsk Regional Court 10/10/2018 |
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. |
3,500 |
|
|
6030/19 25/12/2018 |
Anastasiya Sergeyevna GRIGORYEVA 1993 |
Lepekhin Andrey Gennadyevich Chelyabinsk |
Chelyabinsk
|
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO |
fine of RUB 5,000 |
Chelyabinsk Regional Court 25/10/2018 |
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
|
3,500 |
|
|
6041/19 26/12/2018 |
Ruslan Vladimirovich KHAFIZOV 1988 |
Lepekhin Andrey Gennadyevich Chelyabinsk |
Chelyabinsk
|
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO |
fine of RUB 10,000 |
Chelyabinsk Regional Court 01/11/2018 |
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
|
3,500 |
|
|
6044/19 26/12/2018 |
Aleksey Nikolayevich BRYANTSEV 1979 |
Lepekhin Andrey Gennadyevich Chelyabinsk |
Chelyabinsk
|
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO |
fine of RUB 10,000 |
Chelyabinsk Regional Court 25/10/2018 |
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
|
3,500 |
|
|
6687/19 21/01/2019 |
Vladimir Ivanovich CHERNYSHEV 1966 |
Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius |
Belgorod
|
Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO |
detention for 20 days |
Belgorod Regional Court 19/09/2018 |
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and escorting to the police station on 09/09/2018 for the sole purpose of compiling an administrative offence report;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
|
5,000 |
|
|
7465/19 23/01/2019 |
Yevgeniy Levonovich BAGDASAROV 1988 |
Sabinin Andrey Vasilyevich Stavropol |
Stavropol
|
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO |
fine of RUB 20,000 |
Stavropol Regional Court 24/10/2018 |
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
|
3,500 |
|
|
7469/19 22/01/2019 |
Yevgeniy Vladislavovich LAZUTIN 1993 |
Sabinin Andrey Vasilyevich Stavropol |
Stavropol
|
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO |
fine of RUB 10,000 |
Stavropol Regional Court 24/10/2018 |
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
|
3,500 |
|
|
7473/19 22/01/2019 |
Maksim Vladimirovich VILENSKIY 1987 |
Sabinin Andrey Vasilyevich Stavropol |
Stavropol
|
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO |
fine of RUB 10,000 |
Stavropol Regional Court 24/10/2018 |
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
|
3,500 |
|
|
7476/19 22/01/2019 |
Maksim Yevgenyevich PESHKOV 1985 |
Sabinin Andrey Vasilyevich Stavropol |
Stavropol
|
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO |
fine of RUB 10,000 |
Stavropol Regional Court 24/10/2018 |
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
|
3,500 |
|
|
7479/19 22/01/2019 |
Aleksey Nikolayevich VASILENKO 1959 |
Sabinin Andrey Vasilyevich Stavropol |
Stavropol
|
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO |
fine of RUB 10,000 |
Stavropol Regional Court 24/10/2018 |
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
|
3,500 |
|
|
7482/19 22/01/2019 |
Lyudmila Anatolyevna BORISENKO 1965 |
Sabinin Andrey Vasilyevich Stavropol |
Stavropol
|
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO |
fine of RUB 10,000 |
Stavropol Regional Court 24/10/2018 |
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
|
3,500 |
|
|
7484/19 22/01/2019 |
Sergey Nikolayevich BORISENKO 1964 |
Sabinin Andrey Vasilyevich Stavropol |
Stavropol
|
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO |
fine of RUB 10,000 |
Stavropol Regional Court 24/10/2018 |
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
|
3,500 |
|
|
7488/19 22/01/2019 |
Olga Aleksandrovna GERASYUK 1993 |
Sabinin Andrey Vasilyevich Stavropol |
Stavropol
|
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO |
fine of RUB 10,000 |
Stavropol Regional Court 24/10/2018 |
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
|
3,500 |
|
|
7489/19 22/01/2019 |
Sergey Aleksandrovich MAKSIMENKO 1984 |
Sabinin Andrey Vasilyevich Stavropol |
Stavropol
|
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO |
fine of RUB 10,000 |
Stavropol Regional Court 24/10/2018 |
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. |
3,500 |
|
|
7490/19 22/01/2019 |
Yevgeniy Aleksandrovich ROMANOV 1996 |
Sabinin Andrey Vasilyevich Stavropol |
Stavropol
|
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO |
fine of RUB 10,000 |
Stavropol Regional Court 24/10/2018 |
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
|
3,500 |
|
|
7492/19 22/01/2019 |
Alla Pavlovna MOROZOVA 1965 |
Sabinin Andrey Vasilyevich Stavropol |
Stavropol
|
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO |
fine of RUB 10,000 |
Stavropol Regional Court 24/10/2018 |
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
|
3,500 |
|
|
13467/19 12/02/2019 |
Aleksandra Dmitriyevna LUKYANENKO 1997 |
Peredruk Aleksandr Dmitriyevich St Petersburg |
St Petersburg
|
Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO |
fine of RUB 10,000 |
St Petersburg City Court 04/10/2018 |
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - detention at the police station in excess of three hours after the offence report was compiled (arrested at 5.15 p.m. on 09/09/2018, brought to the police station at 12.40 a.m. on 10/09/2018, released at 8.35 a.m. on 11/09/2018);
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. |
4,000 |
|
|
13635/19 13/02/2019 |
Polina Yuryevna MIKHAYLOVA 1995 |
Peredruk Aleksandr Dmitriyevich St Petersburg |
St Petersburg
|
Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO |
fine of RUB 10,000 |
St Petersburg City Court 08/11/2018 |
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - detention at the police station in excess of three hours after the offence report was compiled (arrested at 5.15 p.m. and brought to the police station at 5.25 p.m. on 09/09/2018, released at 2.45 p.m. on 11/09/2018);
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. |
4,000 |
|
|
13814/19 01/03/2019 |
Tatyana Nikolayevna ZAYTSEVA 1986 |
Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich Kazan |
Omsk
|
Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO |
fine of RUB 25,000 |
Omsk Regional Court 30/10/2018 |
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
|
3,500 |
|
|
15103/19 12/02/2019 |
Aleksandr Yuryevich SERGEYEV 1999 |
Peredruk Aleksandr Dmitriyevich St Petersburg |
St Petersburg
|
Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO |
fine of RUB 10,000 |
St Petersburg City Court 08/11/2018 |
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - detention at the police station in excess of three hours after the offence report was compiled (arrested at 4 p.m. on 09/09/2018, brought to the police station at 5.25 a.m. on 10/09/2018, released at 2.45 p.m. on 11/09/2018);
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. |
4,000 |
|
|
17456/19 14/03/2019 |
Mariya Aleksandrovna LAKHINA 1996 |
Peredruk Aleksandr Dmitriyevich St Petersburg |
St Petersburg
|
Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO |
fine of RUB 10,000 |
St Petersburg City Court 25/10/2018 |
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - detention at the police station in excess of three hours after the offence report was compiled (arrested at 4.30 p.m. on 09/09/2018, brought to the police station at 12.40 a.m. on 10/09/2018, released at 8.30 a.m. on 11/09/2018);
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. |
4,000 |
|
|
18775/19 19/03/2019 |
Andrey Aleksandrovich MANICHENKO 1956 |
Lepekhin Andrey Gennadyevich Chelyabinsk |
Chelyabinsk
|
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO |
fine of RUB 75,000 |
Chelyabinsk Regional Court 18/10/2018 (amended by the decision of the Deputy President of the Chelyabinsk Regional Court on 26/02/2019) |
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
|
4,000 |
|
|
20463/19 26/03/2019 |
Denis Alekseyevich KRAVCHENKO 1997 |
Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich Kazan |
Ulan-Ude
|
Article 20.2 § 1 of CAO |
fine of RUB 15,000 |
Supreme Court of the Buryatia Republic 22/10/2018 |
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
|
3,500 |
|
|
22087/19 12/04/2019 |
Andrey Vladimirovich NEKURYASHCHIKH 1966 |
Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich Kazan |
Omsk
|
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO |
fine of RUB 10,000 |
Omsk Regional Court 11/12/2018 |
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - detention at the police station in excess of three hours after the offence report was compiled (arrested at 3.30 p.m. and brought to the police station at 4.30 p.m. on 09/09/2018, released at 2 p.m. on 10/09/2018);
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. |
4,000 |
|
|
22689/19 12/04/2019 |
Alla Vladimirovna KUZNETSOVA 1967 |
Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich Kazan |
Ulan-Ude
|
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO |
fine of RUB 10,000 |
Supreme Court of Buryatia Republic 12/11/2018 |
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. |
3,500 |
|
|
24633/19 09/04/2019 |
Mikhail Filippovich NIKANOROV 1997 |
Mikhaylova Varvara Dmitriyevna St Petersburg |
St Petersburg
|
Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO |
detention for 7 days |
St Petersburg City Court 11/10/2018 |
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - detention at the police station in excess of three hours after the offence report was compiled (arrested at 6.15 p.m. and brought to the police station at 7.36 p.m. on 09/09/2018, released at 10.39 a.m. on 10/09/2018);
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. |
5,000 |
|
|
24652/19 09/04/2019 |
Denis Sergeyevich GUZHAVIN 1985 |
Mikhaylova Varvara Dmitriyevna St Petersburg |
St Petersburg
|
Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO |
detention for 5 days |
St Petersburg City Court 11/10/2018 |
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - detention at the police station in excess of three hours after the offence report was compiled (arrested at 6.15 p.m. and brought to the police station at 7.36 p.m. on 09/09/2018, released at 10.42 a.m. on 10/09/2018);
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. |
5,000 |
|
|
28932/19 13/05/2019 |
Pavel Sergeyevich PUSHECHNIKOV 1992 |
Karavayev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Nizhniy Novgorod |
Nizhniy Novgorod
|
Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO |
detention for 13 days |
Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court 14/11/2018 |
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. |
5,000 |
|
|
28976/19 13/05/2019 |
Roman Vladimirovich BOLSHAKOV 1992 |
Karavayev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Nizhniy Novgorod |
Nizhniy Novgorod
|
Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO |
detention for 12 days |
Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court 14/11/2018 |
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
|
5,000 |
|
|
29623/19 22/05/2019 |
Irina Olegovna PRISEKINA 1961 |
Bushmakov Aleksey Vladimirovich Yekaterinburg |
Yekaterinburg
|
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO |
fine of RUB 10,000 |
Sverdlovsk Regional Court 04/12/2018 |
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - escorting to a police station for compiling an offence report and detention in excess of 3 hours (brought to the police station at 5.30 p.m. on 09/09/2018 and released at 1.53 a.m. on 10/09/2018);
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. |
4,000 |
|
|
29876/19 08/05/2019 |
Egor Igorevich YAROSHEVSKIY 2000 |
Mikhaylova Varvara Dmitriyevna St Petersburg |
St Petersburg
|
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO |
fine of RUB 10,000 |
St Petersburg City Court 13/11/2018 |
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - detention at the police station in excess of three hours after the offence report was compiled (arrested at 6 p.m. on 09/09/2018, brought to the police station at 1.40 a.m. on 10/09/2018, released in the morning on 11/09/2018);
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. |
4,000 |
|
|
32221/19 29/05/2019 |
Pavel Vitalyevich DAMOV 1971 |
Balog Natalya Andreyevna Krasnoyarsk |
Krasnoyarsk
|
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO |
30 hours of community work |
Krasnoyarsk Regional Court 06/12/2018 |
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
|
3,500 |
|
|
32331/19 30/04/2019 |
Tatyana Aleksandrovna GARAMOVA 1987 |
Botukh Yuliya Igorevna Murino |
St Petersburg
|
Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO |
fine of RUB 10,000 |
St Petersburg City Court 01/11/2018 |
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - detention at the police station in excess of three hours after the offence report was compiled (arrested at 5.57 p.m. and brought to the police station at 8.05 p.m. on 09/09/2018, released at 8.15 a.m. on 10/09/2018);
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. |
4,000 |
|
|
34115/19 17/06/2019 |
Aleksey Viktorovich GONYAKOV 1987 |
Chernyavskaya Andzhelika Viktorovna Oktyabrskiy |
Novosibirsk
|
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO |
fine of RUB 12,000 |
Novosibirsk Regional Court 18/12/2018 |
|
3,500 |
|
|
34307/19 18/06/2019 |
Anton Vadimovich VISHNYAKOV 1997 |
Chernyavskaya Andzhelika Viktorovna Oktyabrskiy |
Novosibirsk
|
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO |
fine of RUB 5,000 |
Novosibirsk Regional Court 18/12/2018 |
|
3,500 |
|
|
35126/19 17/06/2019 |
Vitaliy Alekseyevich BREKALOV 1993 |
Chernyavskaya Andzhelika Viktorovna Oktyabrskiy |
Novosibirsk
|
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO |
fine of RUB 10,000 |
Novosibirsk Regional Court 18/12/2018 |
|
3,500 |
|
|
36767/19 24/06/2019 |
Vladimir Anatolyevich GORBUNOV 1976 |
Chernyavskaya Andzhelika Viktorovna Oktyabrskiy |
Novosibirsk
|
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO |
fine of RUB 5,000 |
Novosibirsk Regional Court 25/12/2018 |
|
3,500 |
|
|
37102/19 28/06/2019 |
Dmitriy Mikhaylovich MIRONOV 1995 |
Bushmakov Aleksey Vladimirovich Yekaterinburg |
Yekaterinburg
|
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO |
fine of RUB 10,000 |
Sverdlovsk Regional Court 23/01/2019 |
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - escorting to a police station for compiling an offence report (arrested at 4.30 p.m., brought to the police station at 6.20 p.m. and released later in the evening on 09/09/2018);
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. |
4,000 |
|
|
42382/19 14/07/2019 |
Svetlana Viktorovna KAVERZINA 1995 |
Chernyavskaya Andzhelika Viktorovna Oktyabrskiy |
Novosibirsk
|
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO |
fine of RUB 5,000 |
Novosibirsk Regional Court 15/01/2019 |
|
3,500 |
|
|
58204/19 29/10/2019 |
Andrey Sergeyevich VODOLAZSKIY 1991 |
Peredruk Aleksandr Dmitriyevich St Petersburg |
St Petersburg
|
Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO |
60 hours of community work |
St Petersburg City Court 11/06/2019 |
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - detention at the police station in excess of three hours after the offence report was compiled (arrested at 4 p.m. and brought to the police station at 8.15 p.m. on 09/09/2018, released at 4.38 p.m. on 10/09/2018);
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. |
4,000 |
|
|
5983/20 16/01/2020 |
Dmitriy Sergeyevich TERESHCHENKO 1993 |
Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow |
Krasnodar
|
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO |
fine of RUB 10,000 |
Krasnodar Regional Court 16/07/2019 |
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
|
3,500 |
|
|
6271/20 16/01/2020 |
Andrey Petrovich KULESHOV 1998 |
Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow |
Krasnodar
|
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO |
fine of RUB 10,000 |
Krasnodar Regional Court 16/07/2019 |
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
|
3,500 |