KOROLKOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA - 44630/21 (Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association : Second Section Committee) [2024] ECHR 216 (14 March 2024)

BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

European Court of Human Rights


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> European Court of Human Rights >> KOROLKOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA - 44630/21 (Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association : Second Section Committee) [2024] ECHR 216 (14 March 2024)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2024/216.html
Cite as: [2024] ECHR 216

[New search] [Contents list] [Help]


 

 

 

SECOND SECTION

CASE OF KOROLKOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

(Applications nos. 44630/21 and 26 others -

see appended list)

 

 

 

 

 

 

JUDGMENT

 

STRASBOURG

14 March 2024

 

This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.


In the case of Korolkova and Others v. Russia,

The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:

 Lorraine Schembri Orland, President,
 Frédéric Krenc,
 Davor Derenčinović, judges,

and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,

Having deliberated in private on 15 February 2024,

Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:

PROCEDURE


1.  The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ("the Convention") on the various dates indicated in the appended table.


2.  The Russian Government ("the Government") were given notice of the applications.

THE FACTS


3.  The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.


4.  The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies. They also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention and Protocols to it.

THE LAW

  1. JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS


5.  Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.

  1. JURISDICTION


6.  The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§ 68-73, 17 January 2023).

  1. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 11 OF THE CONVENTION


7.  The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 11 of the Convention.


8.  The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of assembly (see Kudrevičius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and proportionality of interference with it (see Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, ECHR 2006-XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v. Moldova, no. 33482/06, 31 March 2009).


9.  In the leading cases of Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014 and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.


10.  Having examined all the material submitted to it, and having taken into account the issue of compliance with the six-month time-limit under Article 35 § 1 of the Convention (see Saakashvili v. Georgia (dec.), nos. 6232/20 and 22394/20, §§ 46-59, 1 March 2022, in which the Court addressed the COVID-related extension of the period in question), the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the interferences with the applicants' freedom of assembly were not "necessary in a democratic society".


11.  These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention.

  1. OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW


12.  Some applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention and Article 2 of Protocol no. 7 to the Convention, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible.

13.  Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that these complaints also disclose violations of the Convention and its Protocols in the light of its findings in Butkevich v. Russia, no. 5865/07, §§ 63-65, 13 February 2018, Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 115-31, 10 April 2018, and Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences (the CAO); Lashmankin and Others v. Russia, nos. 57818/09 and 14 others, §§ 402-78, 7 February 2017, regarding restrictions on location or time of public events; Martynyuk v. Russia, no. 13764/15, §§ 38-42, 8 October 2019, relating to the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal against the sentence of administrative detention.

  1. REMAINING COMPLAINTS


14.  Some applicants raised further additional complaints under the Convention. In view of the findings in paragraph 13 above, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints.

  1. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION


15.  Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see in particular Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 25809/17 and 14 others, § 22, 4 October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.

FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,

  1. Decides to join the applications;
  2. Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with these applications as they relate to facts that took place before 16 September 2022;
  3. Declares the complaints under Article 11 of the Convention and the other complaints under the well-established case-law of the Court, as set out in the appended table, admissible, and finds that there is no need to examine separately the remaining complaints of the applicants;
  4. Holds that these applications disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention;
  5. Holds that there has been a violation of the Convention and of Article 2 of Protocol no. 7 to it as regards the other complaints raised under the well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table);
  6. Holds

(a)  that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;

(b)  that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.

Done in English, and notified in writing on 14 March 2024, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.

 

 Viktoriya Maradudina Lorraine Schembri Orland
 Acting Deputy Registrar President

 

 


APPENDIX

List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention

(disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies)

No.

Application no.

Date of introduction

Applicant's name

Year of birth

Representative's name and location

Name of the public event

Location

Date

Administrative / criminal charges

Penalty

Final domestic decision

Court Name

Date

Other complaints under well-established case-law

Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage per applicant

(in euros)[1]

  1.    

44630/21

24/08/2021

Lyubov Aleksandrovna KOROLKOVA

1986

Solovyev Stanislav Vyacheslavovich

Moscow

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Moscow

 

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 20,000

Moscow City Court

02/03/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling administrative offence record and detention at the police station between 4.30 p.m. and 10:30 p.m. on 31/01/2021 - detained for more than three hours after the offence record was drawn up, without any justification,

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,

 

Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - The sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.

4,000

  1.    

44981/21

03/09/2021

Sergey Aleksandrovich MIKHAYLOV

1992

Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich

Vilnius

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Kazan

 

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Supreme Court of Tatarstan

17/03/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 1.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021 and 01/02/2021

4,000

  1.    

45026/21

25/08/2021

Anna Anatolyevna MALYGINA

1985

Shchukin Andrey Yevgenyevcich

Nizhniy Tagil

Opposition rally

 

Yekaterinburg

 

23/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Sverdlovsk Regional Court

14/07/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - the applicant was detained for more than three hours after the administrative offence record was drawn up, without any justification (between noon on 31/01/2021 and 3.30 p.m. on the same day),

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

4,000

  1.    

45027/21

24/08/2021

Nikita Dmitriyevich BOROVKOV

1989

Zboroshenko Nikolay Sergeyevich

Mytishchi

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Moscow

 

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 20,000

Moscow City Court

30/03/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling administrative offence record,

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

 

4,000

  1.    

45028/21

03/09/2021

Dmitriy Vladimirovich PICHUGIN

1966

Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich

Vilnius

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Kurgan

 

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 15,000

Kurgan Regional Court

15/03/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling administrative offence record,

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

 

4,000

  1.    

45030/21

24/08/2021

Kirill Aleksandrovich LITVINOV

1982

Zboroshenko Nikolay Sergeyevich

Mytishchi

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Moscow

 

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 20,000

Moscow City Court

30/03/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling administrative offence record,

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

 

4,000

  1.    

45031/21

24/08/2021

Dmitriy Nikolayevich PARKHOMENKO

1990

Zboroshenko Nikolay Sergeyevich

Mytishchi

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Moscow

 

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 20,000

Moscow City Court

30/03/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling administrative offence record,

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

4,000

  1.    

45035/21

24/08/2021

Vadim Valeryevich PILYUGIN

1979

Zboroshenko Nikolay Sergeyevich

Mytishchi

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Moscow

 

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 20,000

Moscow City Court

30/03/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling administrative offence record,

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

4,000

  1.    

45036/21

03/09/2021

Vladimir Vyacheslavovich NIKOLAYEV

1962

Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich

Moscow

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Tumen

 

23/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 15,000

Tumen Regional Court

17/03/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 29/01/2021 (six days after the protest action) for compiling administrative offence record,

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

 

4,000

  1.  

45039/21

03/09/2021

Kirill Georgiyevich REPIN

1998

Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich

Moscow

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Ulyanovsk

 

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Ulyanovsk Regional Court

18/03/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling administrative offence record,

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

4,000

  1.  

45129/21

17/08/2021

Daniel KRSTEVSKI

1997

Zboroshenko Nikolay Sergeyevich

Mytishchi

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Moscow

 

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Moscow City Court

26/04/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence record on 31/01/2021,

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

 

4,000

  1.  

45156/21

17/08/2021

Dmitriy Vyacheslavovich NEKLYUDOV

1986

Zboroshenko Nikolay Sergeyevich

Mytishchi

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Moscow

 

02/02/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Moscow City Court

26/04/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence record on 02/02/2021,

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

 

4,000

  1.  

45170/21

20/08/2021

Semen Aleksandrovich KOMARCHEV

2000

Tevosov Georgiy Eduardovich

Moscow

Meeting of "Open Russia" movement

 

Moscow

13/03/2021

article 20.33 of CAO

fine of RUB 15,000

Moscow City Court

21/05/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 10.30 a.m. and about 4.00 p.m. on 13/03/2021

4,000

  1.  

45180/21

17/08/2021

Yegor Alekseyevich ISAYEV

1988

Zboroshenko Nikolay Sergeyevich

Mytishchi

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Moscow

 

02/02/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Moscow City Court

16/04/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence record on 02/02/2021,

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

 

4,000

  1.  

45245/21

26/08/2021

Vasiliy Aleksandrovich DMITRIYEV

2000

Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich

Vilnius

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Kurgan

 

23/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 20,000

Kurgan Regional Court

16/03/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record on 23/01/2021,

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

 

4,000

  1.  

26106/22

04/05/2022

Damir Filaritovich BIKMETOV

1967

Tiunov Sergey Yuryevich

Yekaterinburg

Opposition rally

 

Yekaterinburg

 

11/09/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Sverdlovsk Regional Court

08/12/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention for compiling an offence record on 11/09/2021,

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,

 

Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (c) - unfair criminal proceedings due to lack of legal representation - lawyer not allowed in the hearing

 

 

4,000

  1.  

33761/22

06/07/2022

Vladimir Nikolayevich BORETS

1972

Preobrazhenskaya Oksana Vladimirovna

Strasbourg

Anti-war rally

 

Rostov-on-Don

 

06/03/2022

article 19.3 § 1 of CAO

detention for 15 days

Rostov Regional Court

18/03/2022

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 14.30 p.m. on 06/03/2022 and 9.00 a.m. on 07/03/2022,

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,

 

Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.

5,000

  1.  

34153/22

06/07/2022

Ivan Amiranovich ARCHVADZE

1992

Preobrazhenskaya Oksana Vladimirovna

Strasbourg

Anti-war rally

 

Rostov-on-Don

 

06/03/2022

article 19.3 § 1 of CAO

detention for 15 days

Rostov Regional Court

18/03/2022

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 4:00 p.m. on 06/03/2022 and 6:45 a.m. on 07/03/2022,

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,

 

Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.

5,000

  1.  

35626/22

05/07/2022

Dmitriy Aleksandrovich ROZHKOV

1987

Tiunov Sergey Yuryevich

Yekaterinburg

Anti-war rally

 

Yekaterinburg

 

24/02/2022

article 20.2 § 2 of CAO

detention for 9 days

Sverdlovsk Regional Court

05/03/2022

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 4.55 p.m. on 24/02/2022 and 1.10 p.m. on 25/02/2022,

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

 

5,000

  1.  

37485/22

10/07/2022

Aleksandr Andreyevich VALOV

1995

 

 

Anti-war rally

 

St Petersburg

 

27/02/2022

article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO

detention for 10 days

St Petersburg City Court

10/03/2022

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 27/02/2022 for compiling administrative offence record and detention between 5.30 p.m. on 27/02/2022 and 4.00 p.m. on 01/03/2022,

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,

 

Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.

 

 

 

5,000

  1.  

39217/22

27/07/2022

Darya Nikolayevna YEMELYANOVA

2002

 

 

Anti-war rally

 

St Petersburg

 

27/02/2022

article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO

fine of RUB 15,000

St Petersburg City Court

29/03/2022

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 6.00 p.m. on 27/02/2022 and the morning of 28/02/2022, when the applicant was transferred to the court,

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

4,000

  1.  

40943/22

07/08/2022

Yevgeniya Aleksandrovna NISHTA

2003

Zaytsev Roman Olegovich

Volgograd

Anti-war rally

 

Volgograd

 

06/03/2022

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Volgograd Regional Court

09/04/2022

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

 

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence record on 06/03/2022;

4,000

  1.  

44070/22

19/08/2022

Valeriya Anatolyevna GAVRILOVA

2001

Zaytsev Roman Olegovich

Volgograd

Anti-war rally

 

Volgograd

 

06/03/2022

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Volgograd Regional Court

19/04/2022

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence record on 06/03/2022,

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

 

4,000

  1.  

44623/22

20/08/2022

Valeriya Sergeyevna SABLUKOVA

2001

 

 

Anti-war rally

 

Nizhniy Novgorod

 

06/03/2022

article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court

21/04/2022

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 3.10 p.m. on 06/03/2022 and 1.20 p.m. on 07/03/2022,

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

 

4,000

  1.  

45173/22

27/08/2022

Maryana Alekseyevna SAMOKHVALOVA

1995

 

 

Anti-war rally

 

St Petersburg

 

03/03/2022

article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

St Petersburg City Court

28/04/2022

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 8.05 p.m. on 03/03/2022 and 6:30 p.m. on 04/03/2022,

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

4,000

  1.  

45174/22

05/09/2022

Ivan Aleksandrovich PESTEREV

2001

Yermilova Natalya Pavlovna

Yekaterinburg

Anti-war rally

 

Yekaterinburg

 

06/03/2022

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 15,000

Sverdlovsk Regional Court

29/06/2022

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 2.10 p.m. and 9.00 p.m. on 06/03/2022,

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

4,000

  1.  

45195/22

03/09/2022

Denis Andreyevich KONVISAREV

2002

 

 

Anti-war rally

 

Moscow

 

27/02/2022

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Moscow City Court

11/07/2022

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,

 

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 7.45 p.m. on 27/02/2022 and 0.38 a.m. on 28/02/2022

 

4,000

 

 


[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2024/216.html