ZHUKOVETS AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA - 21782/21 (Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association : Fourth Section Committee) [2024] ECHR 275 (28 March 2024)


BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

European Court of Human Rights


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> European Court of Human Rights >> ZHUKOVETS AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA - 21782/21 (Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association : Fourth Section Committee) [2024] ECHR 275 (28 March 2024)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2024/275.html
Cite as: [2024] ECHR 275

[New search] [Contents list] [Help]


 

 

 

FOURTH SECTION

CASE OF ZHUKOVETS AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

(Applications nos. 21782/21 and 18 others -

see appended list)

 

 

 

 

 

 

JUDGMENT

 

STRASBOURG

28 March 2024

 

This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.


In the case of Zhukovets and Others v. Russia,

The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:

 Branko Lubarda, President,
 Armen Harutyunyan,
 Ana Maria Guerra Martins, judges,

and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,

Having deliberated in private on 7 March 2024,

Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:

PROCEDURE


1.  The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ("the Convention") on the various dates indicated in the appended table.


2.  The Russian Government ("the Government") were given notice of the applications.

THE FACTS


3.  The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.


4.  The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.

THE LAW

  1. JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS


5.  Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.

  1. JURISDICTION


6.  The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§ 68-73, 17 January 2023).

  1. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 11 OF THE CONVENTION


7.  The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 11 of the Convention.


8.  The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of assembly (see Kudrevičius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and proportionality of interference with it (see Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, ECHR 2006-XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v. Moldova, no. 33482/06, 31 March 2009).


9.  In the leading cases of Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014 and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.


10.  Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the interferences with the applicants' freedom of assembly were not "necessary in a democratic society".


11.  These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention.

  1. OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW

12.  Some applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention and its Protocols, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible.

13.  Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that these complaints also disclose violations of the Convention and its Protocols in the light of its findings in Butkevich v. Russia, no. 5865/07, §§ 63-65, 13 February 2018, Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 115-31, 10 April 2018, and Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences (the CAO); Novikova and Others v. Russia, nos. 25501/07 and 4 others, 26 April 2016, concerning disproportionate measures against solo demonstrators; and Martynyuk v. Russia, no. 13764/15, §§ 38-42, 8 October 2019, relating to the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal against the sentence of administrative detention.

  1. REMAINING COMPLAINTS


14.  Some applicants raised further additional complaints under Article 6 of the Convention concerning other aspects of fairness of the administrative-offence proceedings. In view of the findings in paragraphs 11 and 13 above, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints.

  1. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION


15.  Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see in particular Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 25809/17 and 14 others, § 22, 4 October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.

FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,

  1. Decides to join the applications;
  2. Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with these applications as they relate to facts that took place before 16 September 2022;
  3. Declares the complaints under Article 11 of the Convention and the other complaints under the well-established case-law of the Court, as set out in the appended table, admissible, and finds that there is no need to examine separately the remaining complaints under Article 6 of the Convention;
  4. Holds that these applications disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention;
  5. Holds that there has been a violation of the Convention and the Protocols thereto as regards the other complaints raised under the well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table);
  6. Holds

(a)  that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;

(b)  that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.

Done in English, and notified in writing on 28 March 2024, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.

 

 Viktoriya Maradudina Branko Lubarda
 Acting Deputy Registrar President

 

 


APPENDIX

List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention

(disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies)

No.

Application no.

Date of introduction

Applicant's name

Year of birth

 

Representative's name and location

Name of the public event

Location

Date

Administrative / criminal offence

Penalty

Final domestic decision

Court Name

Date

Other complaints under

well-established case-law

Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant

(in euros)[1]

  1.    

21782/21

02/04/2021

Anton Alekseyevich ZHUKOVETS

1996

Ivanets Vyacheslav Sergeyevich

Tbilisi, Georgia

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Irkutsk

23/01/2021

article 20.2 § 2 of CAO

detention for 10 days

Irkutsk Regional Court

28/01/2021

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

5,000

  1.    

31152/21

23/05/2021

Arkadiy Vasilyevich TRIFONOV

1966

Bochilo Anna Yevgenyevna

Barnaul

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Barnaul

23/01/2021

 

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Barnaul

21/04/2021

article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

 

 

 

 

article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

 

 

 

40 hours of community work

Altai Regional Court

17/03/2021

 

 

Altay Regional Court

10/06/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 3:00 p.m. on 23/01/2021 and the afternoon of 24/01/2021; escorting to the police station for compiling an offence record on 21/04/2021;

 

 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - in both sets of administrative proceedings (concerning the events of 23/01/2021 and 21/04/2021)

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,000

  1.    

34911/21

20/06/2021

Maksimilian Vitalyevich FEDYUNIN

1979

Bochilo Anna Yevgenyevna

Barnaul

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Lipetsk

23/01/2021

 

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Lipetsk

21/04/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

 

 

 

 

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

 

 

 

fine of RUB 75,000

Lipetsk Regional Court

11/03/2021

 

 

Lipetsk Regional Court

27/05/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record on 23/01/2021; escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 8:05 p.m. on 21/04/2021 and 1:45 p.m. on 22/04/2021,

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - in both sets of administrative proceedings (concerning the events of 23/01/2021 and 21/04/2021)

5,000

  1.    

43664/21

12/08/2021

Valeriya Dmitriyevna DELINA

2000

Glukhov Aleksey Vladimirovich

Novocheboksarsk

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Cheboksary

23/01/2021

 

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Cheboksary

21/04/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

 

 

 

 

article 20.2 § 8 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

 

 

 

40 hours of community work

Supreme Court of the Republic of Chuvashia

25/03/2021

 

Supreme Court of the Republic of Chuvashia

24/06/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence record on 04/06/2021;

 

 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - in both sets of administrative proceedings

 

5,000

  1.    

48085/21

07/09/2021

Irina Kimovna OGANESYAN

1959

Aksenova Darya Dmitriyevna

Kolomna

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Moscow

23/01/2021

article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

fine of RUB 15,000

Moscow City Court

10/03/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence record on 23/01/2021,

 

 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

 

4,000

  1.    

49873/21

22/09/2021

Anton Sergeyevich FILIPPOV

1988

Bochilo Anna Yevgenyevna

Barnaul

 Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Moscow

31/01/2021

 

Anti-war rally

 

Moscow

24/02/2022

article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

 

 

 

 

article 20.2 § 8 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

 

 

 

detention for 30 days

Moscow City Court

26/03/2021

 

 

 

Moscow City Court

14/03/2022

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 3:30 p.m. on 31/01/2021 and 4:00 p.m. on 01/02/2021; escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 8:30 p.m. on 24/02/2022 and 7:10 a.m. on 25/02/2022;

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - in both sets of administrative proceedings (concerning the events of 31/01/2021 and 24/02/2022)

 

Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO / Tushinskiy District Court of Moscow 25/02/2022

5,000

  1.    

50845/21

24/09/2021

Andrey Anatolyevich ISAKOV

1959

Kosnyrev Vladislav Vladimirovich

Syktyvkar

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Syktyvkar

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Supreme Court of the Komi Republic

24/03/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 1:30 p.m. and 9:30 p.m. on 31/01/2021,

 

 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

4,000

  1.    

51556/21

29/09/2021

Olga Alekseyevna ZENINA

1952

Gak Irina Vladimirovna

Rostov-on-Don

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Rostov-on-Don

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Rostov Regional Court

30/03/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 1:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m. on 31/01/2021,

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

 

4,000

  1.    

54357/21

20/10/2021

Yevgeniy Vladimirovich NEVECHERYA

1978

Dimitriyev Dmitriy Sergeyevich

Orenburg

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Orenburg

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine for RUB 10,000

Orenburg Regional Court

20/04/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 1:45 p.m. and 5:30 p.m. on 31/01/2021,

 

 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

4,000

  1.  

27/22

26/11/2021

Konstantin Viktorovich KISELEV

1963

Bushmakov Aleksey Vladimirovich

Yekaterinburg

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Yekaterinburg

23/01/2021

 

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Yekaterinburg

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

 

 

 

 

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 15,000

 

 

 

fine of RUB 15,000

Sverdlovsk Regional Court

24/06/2021

 

 

Sverdlovsk Regional Court

16/06/2021

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - in both sets of administrative proceedings (concerning the events of 23/01/2021 and 31/01/2021)

3,500

  1.  

6368/22

15/01/2022

Darya Aleksandrovna BELYAYEVA

1991

Kachanov Roman Yevgenyevich

Yekaterinburg

Rally against police abuse

 

Yekaterinburg

23/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Sverdlovsk Regional Court

18/08/2021

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

3,500

  1.  

14423/22

16/02/2022

Konstantin Leonidovich MIKHAYLOV

1996

Kochenkov Viktor Valeryevich

Izhevsk

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Izhevsk

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Supreme Court of the Republic of Udmurtia

16/08/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 08:00 p.m. and 11:40 p.m. on 31/01/2021;

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

4,000

  1.  

16210/22

18/01/2022

Aleksey Sergeyevich STERKHOV

1980

Kochenkov Viktor Valeryevich

Izhevsk

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Izhevsk

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Supreme Court of the Republic of Udmurtia

19/07/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 12:30 p.m. and 5:10 p.m. on 31/01/2021,

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

4,000

  1.  

25328/22

(8 applicants)

Vladislav Vitalyevich ARINICHEV

1993

Aleksandr Denisovich BEZRUCHKIN

2000

 

Timofey Aleksandrovich DANILOV

1998

 

Pavel Alekseyevich GLAZKOV

1975

 

Stanislav Yuryevich KARMAKSKIKH

1986

 

Petr Andreyevich SAMSONOV

1990

 

Aleksandr Nikolayevich SHRAMKOV

1965

 

Denis Sergeyevich SKUDAYEV

1981

 

Baranova Natalya Andreyevna

Moscow

Mr Arinichev: anti-war protest

 

Moscow

08/03/2022

 

Mr Bezruchkin: anti-war protest

 

Moscow

11/03/2021

 

Mr Danilov:

anti-war protest

 

Yaroslavl

06/03/2022

 

Mr Glazkov: anti-war protest

 

Moscow

13/03/2022

 

Mr Karmakskikh: anti-war protest

 

Tomsk

06/03/2022

 

 

Mr Samsonov: anti-war protest

 

Tomsk

06/03/2022

 

 

Mr Shramkov: anti-war protest

 

Volokonovka

14/03/2022

 

 

Mr Skudayev: anti-war protest

 

Perm

06/03/2022

 

 

 

article 20.3.3 § 1 of CAO

 

 

 

 

article 20.3.3 § 1 of CAO

 

 

 

 

article 20.3.3 § 1 of CAO

 

 

 

 

article 20.3.3 § 1 of CAO

 

 

 

 

article 20.3.3 § 1 of CAO

 

 

 

 

 

article 20.3.3 § 1 of CAO

 

 

 

 

 

article 20.3.3 § 1 of CAO

 

 

 

 

 

article 20.3.3 § 1 of CAO

fine of RUB 50,000

 

 

 

fine of RUB 50,000

 

 

 

fine of RUB 30,000

 

 

 

fine of RUB 50,000

 

 

 

fine of RUB 45,000

 

 

 

 

fine of RUB 30,000

 

 

 

 

fine of RUB 40,000

 

 

 

 

fine of RUB 30,000

 

 

 

 

Moscow City Court

11/05/2022

 

 

 

Moscow City Court

17/05/2022

 

 

 

Yaroslavl Regional Court

19/05/2022

 

 

Moscow City Court

26/04/2022

 

 

 

Tomsk Regional Court

08/04/2022

 

 

 

Tomsk Regional Court

08/04/2022

 

 

 

Belgorod Regional Court

23/05/2022

 

 

 

Perm Regional Court

26/05/2022

 

 

 

 

 

4,000,

to each of the applicants

  1.  

28106/22

17/05/2022

Marina Pal SINGKH

1997

Fazulyanov Oleg Borisovich

St Petersburg

Photo session to protest violence against women

St Petersburg

25/11/2021

 

Anti-war rally

 

St Petersburg

24/02/2022

article 20.2 § 2 of CAO

 

 

 

 

article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO

fine of RUB 20,000

 

 

 

detention for 15 days

St Petersburg City Court

18/01/2022

 

 

 

St Petersburg City Court

05/04/2022

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 8:50 p.m. on 25/11/2021 and 5:00 p.m. on 27/11/2021; between 9:50 p.m. on 24/02/2022 and 5:15 a.m. on 25/02/2022,

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - in both sets of administrative proceedings (concerning the events of 25/11/2021 and 24/02/2022)

5,000

  1.  

38898/22

22/07/2022

Konstantin Vitalyevich MIKHAYLOV

1987

Kosheleva Inna Viktorovna

Kirov

Opposition rally

 

Kirov

03/02/2022

article 20.2 § 2 of CAO

fine of RUB 20,000

Kirov Regional Court

06/04/2022

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

3,500

  1.  

38906/22

29/07/2022

Artem Aleksandrovich SHCHELOKOV

1988

Bannikov Ruslan Yuryevich

Voronezh

Anti-war protest

 

Voronezh

24/02/2022

article 20.2 § 8 of CAO

detention for 1 day

Voronezh Regional Court

07/04/2022

Art. 10 (1) - disproportionate measures against solo demonstrators - on 06/03/2022 in Voronezh / solo protest against war in Ukraine / article 20.3.3 § 1 of CAO / fine of RUB 30,000 / 06/07/2022 by the Voronezh Regional Court,

 

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 8:00 p.m. on 24/02/2022 and his transfer to court next day, on 25/02/2022; escorting to the police station for compiling an offence record on 06/03/2022,

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - both sets of the proceedings

 

5,000

  1.  

40591/22

10/08/2022

Vladislav Valeryevich BATALOV

1998

Dadayeva Yekaterina Viktorovna

St Petersburg

Anti-war protest

 

St Petersburg

02/04/2022

article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

detention for 10 days

St Petersburg City Court

11/04/2022

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 2:30 p.m. and 11:02 p.m. on 02/04/2022,

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

 

5,000

  1.  

40595/22

10/08/2022

Aleksandr Sergeyevich OREKHOV

1997

Dadayeva Yekaterina Viktorovna

St Petersburg

Anti-war rally

 

St Petersburg

02/04/2022

article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

detention for 10 days

St Petersburg

City Court

11/04/2022

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 2:40 p.m. and 11:43 p.m. on 02/04/2022,

 

 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

5,000

 

 


[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2024/275.html