BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Court of Justice of the European Communities (including Court of First Instance Decisions)


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Court of Justice of the European Communities (including Court of First Instance Decisions) >> Commission of the European Communities v Ireland. (Member States) [1995] EUECJ C-240/94 (11 August 1995)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/EUECJ/1995/C24094.html
Cite as: [1995] EUECJ C-240/94

[New search] [Help]


IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE - The source of this judgment is the web site of the Court of Justice of the European Communities. The information in this database has been provided free of charge and is subject to a Court of Justice of the European Communities disclaimer and a copyright notice. This electronic version is not authentic and is subject to amendment.
   

61994J0240
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 August 1995.
Commission of the European Communities v Ireland.
Failure to fulfil obligations - Non-transposition of Directive 89/336/EEC and 92/31/EEC - Electromagnetic compatibility.
Case C-240/94.

European Court reports 1995 Page I-02593

 
   






++++
Member States ° Obligations ° Implementation of directives ° Undisputed failure to fulfil obligations
(EC Treaty, Art. 169)



In Case C-240/94,
Commission of the European Communities, represented by Thomas F. Cusack, Legal Adviser, and by David McIntyre, national official seconded to the Legal Service, acting as Agents, with an address for service in Luxembourg at the office of Carlos Gómez de la Cruz, of its Legal Service, Wagner Centre, Kirchberg,
applicant,
v
Ireland, represented by Michael A. Buckley, Chief State Solicitor, acting as Agent, with an address for service in Luxembourg at the Irish Embassy, 28 Route d' Arlon,
defendant,
APPLICATION for a declaration that, by omitting to bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 89/336/EEC of 3 May 1989 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to electromagnetic compatibility (OJ 1989 L 139, p. 19), and Council Directive 92/31/EEC of 28 April 1992 amending Directive 89/336/EEC (OJ 1992 L 126, p. 11), Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 12(1) and Article 2(1) of the abovementioned directives and Article 189 of the EC Treaty,
THE COURT (Fifth Chamber),
composed of: C. Gulmann, President of the Chamber, P. Jann, J.C. Moitinho de Almeida, D.A.O. Edward and L. Sevón (Rapporteur), Judges,
Advocate General: G. Cosmas,
Registrar: R. Grass,
having regard to the report of the Judge-Rapporteur,
after hearing the Opinion of the Advocate General at the sitting on 8 June 1995,
gives the following
Judgment



1 By application lodged at the Court Registry on 30 August 1994, the Commission of the European Communities brought an action under Article 169 of the EC Treaty for a declaration that, by omitting to bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 89/336/EEC of 3 May 1989 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to electromagnetic compatibility (OJ 1989 L 139, p. 19, hereinafter "Directive 89/336"), and with Council Directive 92/31/EEC of 28 April 1992 amending Directive 89/336 (OJ 1992 L 126, p. 11, hereinafter "Directive 92/31"), Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 12(1) and 2(1) of the abovementioned directives and Article 189 of the EC Treaty.
2 Under Article 12(1) of Directive 89/336 and Article 2(1) of Directive 92/31 the Member States were required, by 1 July 1991 as regards the first-mentioned directive and not later than 28 July 1992 as regards the second directive, to adopt and publish the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with those directives and to inform the Commission thereof. Those articles also required the Member States to apply those provisions as from 1 January 1992 and 28 October 1992 respectively.
3 Since it had received no communication concerning the measures taken to transpose the directives in Ireland, the Commission, by letter of 14 October 1992, addressed to the Irish Government a letter of formal notice requiring it to submit its observations within a period of two months, in accordance with Article 169 of the Treaty.
4 Since no reply was received in response to that letter of formal notice, the Commission on 2 July 1993 issued a reasoned opinion requesting Ireland to take the measures necessary to comply with it within a period of two months.
5 By letter of 17 September 1993 the Irish Government informed the Commission that it was hoping to be in a position to transpose Directive 89/336, as amended by Directive 92/31, into national law before the end of 1993. Having received no further notification since then, the Commission brought the present proceedings.
6 In its application the Commission recalled the obligations incumbent on the Member States under Articles 5 and 189 of the Treaty. It noted that Ireland had not taken the measures necessary to comply with the requirements of Directives 89/336 and 92/31 and that, therefore, it had failed to fulfil its obligations.
7 Ireland submitted that the preparation of the ministerial regulations necessary in order to give effect to the obligations imposed by those directives was at an advanced stage and that they would be ready in the near future. Once the transposition measures had been adopted, Ireland would propose to the Commission that it terminate these proceedings.
8 Since the directives have not been transposed within the prescribed periods, the declaration must be granted in the terms sought by the Commission.



Costs
9 Under Article 69(2) of the Rules of Procedure, the unsuccessful party is to be ordered to pay the costs if they have been applied for in the successful party' s pleadings. The Commission asked for Ireland to be ordered to pay the costs. Since Ireland has been unsuccessful, it must be ordered to pay the costs.



On those grounds,
THE COURT (Fifth Chamber)
hereby:
1. Declares that, by omitting to bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 89/336/EEC of 3 May 1989 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to electromagnetic compatibility and Council Directive 92/31/EEC of 28 April 1992 amending Directive 89/336, Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 12(1) and Article 2(1) of the abovementioned directives and Article 189 of the EC Treaty;
2. Orders Ireland to pay the costs.

 
  © European Communities, 2001 All rights reserved


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/EUECJ/1995/C24094.html