BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions >> Reichmann & Anor v Gauntlett & Anor [2006] EWCA Civ 967 (20 June 2006)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2006/967.html
Cite as: [2006] EWCA Civ 967

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


Neutral Citation Number: [2006] EWCA Civ 967
B2/2005/2438

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION)
ON APPEAL FROM GUILDFORD COUNTY COURT
(HIS HONOUR JUDGE REID QC)

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand
London, WC2
20th June 2006

B e f o r e :

LORD JUSTICE AULD
LORD JUSTICE BUXTON
LORD JUSTICE RICHARDS

____________________

REICHMANN & ANR CLAIMANTS/RESPONDENTS
- v -
GAUNTLETT & ANR DEFENDANTS/APPELLANTS

____________________

(DAR Transcript of
Smith Bernal Wordwave Limited
190 Fleet Street, London EC4A 2AG
Tel No: 020 7404 1400 Fax No: 020 7831 8838
Official Shorthand Writers to the Court)

____________________

THE APPELLANT APPEARED IN PERSON.
THE REPONDENT DID NOT APPEAR AND WAS NOT REPRESENTED.

____________________

HTML VERSION OF JUDGMENT
____________________

Crown Copyright ©

  1. LORD JUSTICE AULD: Mr Gauntlett, as I mentioned to you at the beginning of the hearing this morning, the question put to this court and to the court below is one of a general nature, seeking an answer of an unqualified nature. It may be, as I also said to you, that the two lines of authority may indicate that the answer to this is possibly general, possibly not; possibly qualified, possibly unqualified. The matter comes before the court, as it did below, as a preliminary point which, depending on the answer given to it, would then have to be heard on its facts before the judge below. It is a point of some importance in its absolute and general form.
  2. Unfortunately, the other side is not here to argue the case and to develop any points which may not have been developed below, which would assist on the point of principle.
  3. In the circumstances, because of the importance of the matter being argued fully and because of the important point of principle with which we have been presented, we consider that we should adjourn the appeal and seek the assistance of an advocate to the court, appointed through the medium of the Attorney General to assist the court.
  4. So, that is what we shall do. We shall adjourn the appeal and seek the assistance of an advocate to the court. The matter will be re-listed for further argument.
  5. The Court will notify the landlords, the respondents, of our intention, and it will of course be open to them to be represented at the adjourned hearing.
  6. Order: Appeal adjourned.


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2006/967.html