[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]
	England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions >> Mölnlycke Health Care AB & Anor v BSN Medical Ltd & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 1053 (12 October 2010) URL: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2010/1053.html Cite as: [2010] EWCA Civ 1053

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION)
ON APPEAL FROM THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
CHANCERY DIVISION PATENTS COURT
The Hon Mr Justice Floyd
HC09 C03755

		Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL
		12/10/2010

Jacob LJ (giving the Judgment of the Court):

1. The Court has considered a number of written representations from the solicitors for BSN seeking permission to appeal to the Supreme Court from our decision of 30^th July 2010. No application for such permission was made at the time we gave that decision, though it obviously could have been.
2. The case turned on whether the Swedish Court was first seized of the issue of whether or not the Mölnlycke patent claim covered the BSN actual products. We asked the Swedish Judge whether that was in issue and got a clear answer – not "as the case stands now."
3. The matter relied upon for permission to appeal concerns communications between the Swedish Judge and the lawyers for BSN subsequent to our decision and a subsequent decision in Germany. The suggestion is that these materials show that the Swedish court may be seized of the issue.
4. Whether it is already so seized turns entirely on the evidence. As the evidence stood before us it was clearly not so seized. No question of principle - still less one of general importance – arises.
5. For that reason we refuse permission to appeal to the Supreme Court.