![]() |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
England and Wales Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> England and Wales Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Decisions >> APZ, R. v [2025] EWCA Crim 152 (23 January 2025) URL: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/2025/152.html Cite as: [2025] EWCA Crim 152 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
CRIMINAL DIVISION
ON APPEAL FROM THE CROWN COURT AT WOOLWICH
HIS HONOUR JUDGE MANN KC T20217245
Strand London WC2A 2LL |
||
B e f o r e :
MRS JUSTICE STACEY
RECORDER OF CARDIFF
(Her Honour Judge Tracey Lloyd-Clarke)
____________________
REGINA |
||
- and - |
||
APZ |
||
(1992 Sexual Offences Act applies) |
____________________
Lower Ground, 46 Chancery Lane, London WC2A 1JE
Tel No: 020 7404 1400; Email: [email protected] (Official Shorthand Writers to the Court)
____________________
Crown Copyright ©
MRS JUSTICE STACEY:
The facts
(1) The admission of the applicant's caution for domestic abuse against the complainant's mother in 2004;
(2) The cross-examination of C1 was said to have overstated and misrepresented the applicant's case;
(3) The cross-examination of the complainant's mother was said to have been flawed;
(4) The treatment of the evidence of complaints made by the boys in 2016 was criticised; and finally,
(5) the treatment of the evidence relating to the person referred to as 'Uncle Charles' whom it was suggested could have been the perpetrator of any abuse, if indeed any had taken place.
Items (1) - (4) above were matters of judgment by trial counsel in consultation with her client and thus amount to an allegation of alleged incompetence by trial counsel. The fifth matter is similarly framed, although the position is more complicated. It was the trial judge who prohibited cross-examination about 'Uncle Charles' in the complainants' mother's cross-examination and ruled against defence trial counsel. The grounds of appeal, however, do not seek to criticise any of the judge's rulings or his legal directions or the accuracy and fairness of his summing-up.