BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

England and Wales High Court (Senior Courts Costs Office) Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> England and Wales High Court (Senior Courts Costs Office) Decisions >> Rugby Mansions Ltd v Ortwein [2003] EWHC 9041 (Costs) (28 July 2003)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Costs/2003/9041.html
Cite as: [2003] EWHC 9041 (Costs)

[New search] [Help]


This summary of a judgment has been obtained from the Supreme Court Costs Office pages on the HM Courts Service web site. The citation used by BAILII is not an officially approved citation. The full text of the judgment may have an official Neutral Citation issued by the court, and may be available elsewhere on BAILII.

 

 

No.21 of 2003


Rugby Mansions Ltd v Ortwein
28 July 2003
Mr Justice Lloyd (Sitting Without Assessors)

The claimant was a co-operative and owned the freehold of a block of flats where the defendant was a lessee.   The claimant commenced proceedings for non payment of service charges, to which the defendant counterclaimed for damages estimated at £500,000 for breach of the claimant’s obligations as a landlord.   Following an 11 day trial the counterclaim was dismissed and judgment entered against D who was ordered to pay the costs of the counterclaim subject to detailed assessment.  £120,000 was paid on account and the claimant’s bill was for £350,000.    The defendants raised before the Costs Judge the issue of proportionality but the Costs Judge held that the costs were not apparently disproportionate and proceeded over three days to assess the bill, which he reduced to £300,000.

On appeal the Judge held that the Costs Judge had misdirected himself in respect of the Lownds test, and remitted the case to a different Costs Judge to consider whether the costs as assessed were proportionate or not.    If they were, then the assessment was to stand, but if not, presumably it would have to start de novo.

However the Judge said that it was not necessary for a Costs Judge to go through the items set out in CPR 44.5 as a check list in deciding the question of proportionality under the Lownds principle.


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Costs/2003/9041.html