[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] [DONATE]
	England and Wales High Court (King's Bench Division) Decisions
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> England and Wales High Court (King's Bench Division) Decisions >> Qatar Investment And Projects Development Holding Company & Anor v Phoenix Ancient Art SA & Ors [2025] EWHC 956 (KB) (18 February 2025) URL: https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/KB/2025/956.html Cite as: [2025] EWHC 956 (KB)

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
KING'S BENCH DIVISION

		Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London WC2A 2LL
		18 February 2025

If this Transcript is to be reported or published, there is a requirement to ensure that no reporting restriction will be breached. This is particularly important in relation to any case involving a sexual offence, where the victim is guaranteed lifetime anonymity (Sexual Offences (Amendment) Act 1992), or where an order has been made in relation to a young person.

MR JUSTICE GARNHAM :

1. I will indicate now that, for the reasons advanced by the defendant, it seems to me it is proper and appropriate that that part of these proceedings which deals with the matters contained in the ninth witness statements of Mr Tapper and Mr Aboutaam should be dealt with in private. I make it clear, however, that that restriction will not apply to the judgment, subject to any further application being made upon receipt of the draft judgment.
2. That, I think, deals with the proposed order number 1, namely:

"Pursuant to CPR 39.2(3), such part of the hearing of the claimants' application as deals with and considers the Aboutaam evidence and the Tapper evidence shall be held in private".

3. I decline to make an order now that the judgment will be redacted accordingly; instead, the judgment will be produced in draft in the usual way and I will hear any applications for redaction upon receipt of it. I am not going to fore-guess that outcome.
4. As to paragraph 2, the defendant asks for an order that the Aboutaam evidence and the Tapper statement shall not be retained on the court file or, in the alternative, that any application by any non-party to obtain from the court records a copy of that evidence shall be made on notice to the parties. I prefer the second of those two options. I decline to make an order that it should not be retained on the court file. It seems to me it is important that the court file is complete in this regard, but I see the force of the alternative submission and therefore make an order in those terms.
5. As to the third order that the defendants seek, namely an order pursuant to CPR 31.22(2) and as to the use to be made of the documents contained in exhibit HA9 outside these proceedings, I reserve the position until I have heard further argument. I indicate now that the only question live is whether or not the claimants should be entitled to use that document in enforcement proceedings, and notably enforcement proceedings in other jurisdictions.
6. The question of costs I will deal with at the conclusion of the case as a whole.
(See separate transcript for continuation of proceedings) - - - - - - - - - -