BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
The Law Commission |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> The Law Commission >> RENTING HOMES 1: STATUS AND SECURITY (A Consultation Paper) [2002] EWLC 162 (28 March 2002) URL: http://www.bailii.org/ew/other/EWLC/2002/162.html Cite as: [2002] EWLC 162 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
A Consultation Paper
London: The Stationery Office
The Law Commission was set up by section 1 of the Law Commissions Act 1965 for the purpose of promoting the reform of the law.
The Law Commissioners are:
The Right Honourable Lord Justice Carnwath CVO, Chairman
Professor Hugh Beale, QC
Mr Stuart Bridge
Professor Martin Partington
Judge Alan Wilkie, QC
The Secretary of the Law Commission is Mr Michael Sayers and its offices are at Conquest House, 37-38 John Street, Theobalds Road, London WC1N 2BQ.
This consultation paper, completed on 28 March 2002, is circulated for comment and criticism only. It does not represent the final views of the Law Commission.
The Law Commission would be grateful for comments on this consultation paper before 12 July 2002. Comments may be sent –
By post to:
Helen Carr
Law Commission
Conquest House
37-38 John Street
Theobalds Road
London
WC1N 2BQ
Tel: 020-7453-1290
Fax: 020-7453-1297
By e-mail to:
[email protected]
It would be helpful if, where possible, comments sent by post could also be sent on disk, or by e-mail to the above address, in any commonly used format.
All responses to this Consultation Paper will be treated as public documents, and may be made available to third parties, unless the respondent specifically requests that a response be treated as confidential, in whole or in part.
The text of this consultation paper is available on the Internet at:
http://www.lawcom.gov.uk
CONTENTS
PART I: INTRODUCTION | Part I |
Background to the project | 1.1 |
Scoping paper | 1.6 |
Terms of reference | 1.8 |
Timetable for the project: a phased approach | 1.9 |
Outcomes | 1.12 |
Law reform and social policy | 1.14 |
Defining housing law: the search for principle | 1.17 |
Guaranteeing security of tenure | 1.20 |
Possession proceedings – the need for due process | 1.25 |
The consumer perspective | 1.32 |
Human rights | 1.36 |
Outline of the scheme | 1.37 |
Focus of our proposals | 1.44 |
Limits to the contractual approach – the need for a jurisdiction for the court | 1.45 |
Terminology | 1.48 |
Contents of the consultation paper | 1.50 |
The continued importance of the rented sector of the housing market | 1.64 |
England | 1.64 |
Wales | 1.74 |
Comment | 1.78 |
Issues not covered in this paper | 1.83 |
Disrepair | 1.84 |
Tenancy deposits | 1.85 |
Specialist courts | 1.86 |
Rent control and regulation | 1.88 |
Housing benefit | 1.89 |
Exempt sectors of the market | 1.90 |
Right to buy | 1.91 |
Homelessness | 1.94 |
Regulatory impact | 1.95 |
Acknowledgements | 1.99 |
PART II: THE EVOLUTION OF HOUSING LAW | Part II |
Introduction | 2.1 |
First legislative initiatives – the 19th century | 2.3 |
Housing conditions and public health | 2.3 |
The regulation of the private rented sector 1915 – 1980 | 2.11 |
Rent control, illegal premiums and security of tenure | 2.11 |
Exclusions – payments for board, attendance and the use of furniture | 2.15 |
Moves to decontrol | 2.17 |
New protective measures | 2.19 |
Consolidation | 2.30 |
Introduction of housing benefit – rent allowances and rent rebates | 2.31 |
Housing conditions | 2.34 |
The impact of protective legislation | 2.36 |
The development of the public rented sector 1920-1980 | 2.41 |
Discretion v rights | 2.46 |
A national rent rebate scheme – subsidising tenants | 2.49 |
The development of the housing association sector to 1980 | 2.53 |
Security of tenure | 2.58 |
Rent regulation | 2.61 |
Rent allowances | 2.63 |
Housing associations – a hybrid | 2.64 |
Developments from 1980 to the present day | 2.65 |
The private rented sector | 2.69 |
The local authority sector | 2.85 |
Introductory tenancies | 2.95 |
The housing association/registered social landlord sector | 2.97 |
Large Scale Voluntary Transfers | 2.107 |
Conclusions: lessons of history | 2.119 |
The need for regulation | 2.119 |
Legislative strategies | 2.122 |
Changing contexts 1: the private sector | 2.125 |
Changing contexts 2: the local authority sector | 2.134 |
Changing contexts 3: housing associations | 2.137 |
The rise of a consumer perspective | 2.138 |
Other issues | 2.142 |
PART III: HOUSING STATUS AND SECURITY OF TENURE: PROMOTING SIMPLIFICATION | Part III |
Introduction | 3.1 |
The challenge of simplification | 3.4 |
Housing status: the statutory schemes | 3.11 |
Secure tenancies | 3.12 |
Introductory tenancies | 3.13 |
Assured tenancies | 3.14 |
Assured shorthold tenancies | 3.15 |
Rent Act protected tenancies | 3.17 |
Excluded tenure groups | 3.18 |
Tenancies falling within other statutory schemes | 3.19 |
Lettings for particular purposes | 3.22 |
Tenancies which have been left outside the schemes | 3.24 |
Only or principal home | 3.25 |
Other exclusions from the secure tenancy regime | 3.26 |
Other exemptions: Crown tenancies | 3.27 |
Licensees | 3.28 |
Protection from Eviction Act 1977 | 3.29 |
Total exclusion from statutory regulation | 3.33 |
Security of tenure and grounds for possession | 3.38 |
Secure tenancies | 3.39 |
Assured tenancies | 3.42 |
Rent Act protected tenancies | 3.44 |
Occupiers outside the principal schemes | 3.47 |
The assured tenancy, secure tenancy and rent act tenancy schemes compared | 3.48 |
Use of mandatory grounds | 3.48 |
Notices seeking possession | 3.52 |
Drafting differences | 3.65 |
Differences not relating to security of tenure | 3.73 |
The project goal | 3.74 |
PART IV: THE APPROACH IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS | Part IV |
Housing (Scotland) Act 2001 | 4.4 |
Creating one form of social tenancy | 4.10 |
Simplification and modernisation | 4.13 |
Anti social behaviour | 4.24 |
Tenants' Rights | 4.34 |
Short Scottish secure tenancies | 4.44 |
Commonwealth legislation | 4.44 |
Consumer perspective | 4.47 |
Administrative support | 4.50 |
Comprehensive Provision | 4.52 |
Exclusions | 4.55 |
Issues addressed | 4.57 |
Procedures | 4.59 |
Requirements for writing | 4.61 |
Dispute resolution | 4.65 |
Alternative dispute resolution | 4.68 |
Deposits | 4.70 |
Anti social behaviour | 4.74 |
Minors and tenancies | 4.84 |
Conclusion | 4.85 |
PART V: THE IMPACT OF HUMAN RIGHTS LAW | Part V |
Introduction | 5.1 |
The relevant convention articles | 5.4 |
Article 8 | 5.5 |
Article 8(1) | 5.11 |
Justification under Article 8(2) | 5.14 |
Article 6 | 5.17 |
Article 1 of the first protocol | 5.36 |
The impact of the Convention in domestic law | 5.42 |
The nature of registered social landlords | 5.42 |
The approach to Article 8(1) | 5.54 |
The assured shorthold regime | 5.56 |
Alconbury and the requirements of Article 6 | 5.58 |
Human rights and housing law: some conclusions | 5.70 |
PART VI: THE CONSUMER APPROACH: FOCUSSING ON THE AGREEMENT | Part VI |
Introduction | 6.1 |
The need for a contract | 6.5 |
The application of the law on unfair contract terms to housing agreements | 6.11 |
The purpose of applying a consumer law approach to housing | 6.11 |
Unfair contract terms law: the legislative background | 6.21 |
Relationship with our proposed default terms | 6.25 |
Requirements of transparency and fairness | 6.27 |
Consequences of unfairness | 6.36 |
Limitations | 6.40 |
Other factors making terms invalid | 6.56 |
Principles of contract law | 6.56 |
Shams | 6.57 |
Discrimination law | 6.58 |
Human Rights Law | 6.59 |
The need for a written agreement | 6.60 |
Requirements for validity | 6.63 |
Requirements for provision of information about the terms of the agreement | 6.72 |
Requirements for provision of information about the landlord | 6.79 |
Recording rent payments | 6.83 |
The terms of the agreement | 6.89 |
Part A – the core terms | 6.101 |
Part B – compulsory terms | 6.106 |
Part C – negotiable/default terms | 6.112 |
Sanctions | 6.122 |
Failure to provide an agreement | 6.125 |
Failure to provide information about the landlord | 6.136 |
Variation of agreements | 6.140 |
Rent variations | 6.145 |
Non-rent variations | 6.149 |
Effect of a variation | 6.156 |
Ensuring respect for the contract | 6.159 |
The potential problem | 6.159 |
Possible approaches | 6.164 |
Problems | 6.171 |
Alternative dispute resolution | 6.176 |
PART VII: THE TYPE I AGREEMENT: THE SECURITY REGIME | Part VII |
Introduction | 7.1 |
The type I agreement | 7.5 |
A single social tenancy | 7.6 |
A single long-term agreement | 7.7 |
Use of the type I agreement | 7.11 |
Fixed term type I agreements? | 7.12 |
Court orders for possession: discretionary or mandatory? | 7.18 |
Serious rent arrears | 7.27 |
Mortgage default | 7.45 |
Other mandatory grounds | 7.54 |
Security of tenure: the terms in the agreement | 7.58 |
Occupier default | 7.60 |
Social policy | 7.67 |
Estate management. | 7.77 |
The powers of the court | 7.84 |
The "ghost" grounds for possession | 7.87 |
Mapping existing agreements onto the new scheme | 7.96 |
Summary | 7.97 |
PART VIII: THE TYPE II AGREEMENT: THE SECURITY REGIME | Part VIII |
Introduction | 8.1 |
The type II agreement | 8.2 |
Periodic and fixed term agreements | 8.6 |
Use of the type II agreement | 8.9 |
The court's powers to order possession | 8.11 |
Accelerated possession proceedings | 8.13 |
The six months' moratorium | 8.15 |
Security of tenure: the terms in the agreement | 8.30 |
Circumstances justifying a mandatory possession order | 8.32 |
Circumstances justifying a possession order on a discretionary basis | 8.47 |
Break clauses | 8.60 |
Expiry of fixed term tenancies | 8.69 |
Summary | 8.79 |
PART IX: THE SCOPE OF THE SCHEME | Part IX |
Introduction | 9.1 |
The relationship with other statutory schemes | 9.5 |
Business tenancies | 9.5 |
Licensed premises | 9.12 |
Agricultural tenancies | 9.14 |
Long leases | 9.18 |
Should the lease-licence distinction be retained as a test for determining the scope of the scheme? | 9.21 |
Background | 9.24 |
The continuing significance of the lease-licence distinction | 9.29 |
Should the lease-licence distinction be used to determine the scope of our proposed scheme? | 9.39 |
Exclusions | 9.43 |
Making agreements with those under the age of 18. | 9.54 |
Other definitional issues affecting the scope of the scheme | 9.58 |
The requirement for "rent" | 9.59 |
The requirement for the premises to be a person's home | 9.17 |
Conferment of a right to occupy | 9.75 |
Only or principal home? | 9.79 |
Separateness? | 9.84 |
Individual? | 9.90 |
Statutorily excluded categories of agreement | 9.92 |
Exclusions not affected by the six months' moratorium | 9.94 |
Other exclusions: (1) assuming the six months' moratorium is retained | 9.109 |
Other exclusions: (2) assuming the six months' moratorium is removed | 9.133 |
Summary | 9.162 |
Crown tenancies | 9.164 |
PART X: TERMINATING AGREEMENTS | Part X |
Introduction | 10.1 |
Due process – the notice requirements | 10.3 |
Why have statutory requirements for notice? | 10.8 |
Lengths of notice periods | 10.12 |
Replacing common law rules | 10.21 |
Service of notices | 10.26 |
Making landlords' notices more transparent | 10.27 |
Termination by the occupier | 10.49 |
Occupier's notice to quit | 10.49 |
Exercise of break clause by the occupier | 10.53 |
Consequences of occupier's failure to leave | 10.56 |
Occupier's response to a repudiatory breach | 10.58 |
Express surrender | 10.62 |
Abandonment | 10.65 |
PART XI: USING THE NEW AGREEMENTS | Part XI |
Introduction | 11.1 |
Social landlords | 11.4 |
Exceptions | 11.16 |
Probationary agreements | 11.16 |
Agreements falling outside the scope of the type I agreement. | 11.45 |
Other cases | 11.51 |
Default position | 11.54 |
Private landlords | 11.57 |
Type I agreements | 11.62 |
Type II agreements | 11.65 |
Scope for operation of the market | 11.69 |
PART XII: THE POWERS OF THE COURTS | Part XII |
Introduction | 12.1 |
The Civil Procedure Rules: recent reforms | 12.3 |
The exercise of discretion | 12.7 |
Structuring discretion | 12.11 |
Our proposals | 12.27 |
Application of the structured discretion approach to the court's extended discretion: enforcement proceedings | 12.29 |
Rent arrears and suspended possession orders | 12.33 |
Enforcement | 12.42 |
The point at which the agreement ends under a possession order | 12.43 |
Obtaining warrants for possession without a hearing | 12.53 |
PART XIII: ANTI SOCIAL BEHAVIOUR | Part XIII |
Introduction | 13.1 |
The need to combat anti social behaviour | 13.3 |
The current law | 13.10 |
Which landlords? | 13.16 |
Social landlords | 13.17 |
Private landlords | 13.20 |
A general duty to deal with anti social behaviour | 13.23 |
A general duty | 13.25 |
A contractual duty | 13.33 |
Dealing with serious anti social behaviour | 13.37 |
The concept of serious housing related anti social behaviour | 13.38 |
Type II (probationary) agreements | 13.41 |
Type I agreements | 13.61 |
PART XIV: MAPPING EXISTING AGREEMENTS | Part XIV |
ONTO THE NEW SCHEME | |
Secure tenancies and fully assured tenancies let by registered social landlords | 14.3 |
Compulsory general use of type I agreements | 14.4 |
Freedom to choose type I or type II agreements | 14.10 |
Other local authority and registered social landlord tenants | 14.15 |
Private fully assured tenancies | 14.17 |
Assured shorthold tenancies | 14.19 |
Safeguarding the terms of the old tenancy | 14.22 |
Rent Act protected tenancies | 14.26 |
Do the circumstances permitting possession under the type I agreement cover all the Rent Act cases? | 14.28 |
Would the circumstances permitting possession under the type I agreement represent a weakening of the rights of Rent Act protected tenants? | 14.38 |
Conclusion | 14.40 |
The transition to the new scheme | 14.43 |
PART XV: SUMMARY OF PROVISIONAL PROPOSALS AND CONSULTATION QUESTIONS | Part XV |