BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
The Law Commission |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> The Law Commission >> TOWARDS A COMPULSORY PURCHASE CODE: 2 PROCEDURE (A Consultative Report) [2002] EWLC 169(2) (18 November 2002) URL: http://www.bailii.org/ew/other/EWLC/2002/169(2).html Cite as: [2002] EWLC 169(2) |
[New search] [Help]
Part II
(Rc 18.10.02)
the existing law and the new code
2.1 The existing law is best understood in its historical context, which dates back to the early part of the 19th century. In Part II of our Compensation Report[1] we summarised the historical development of the law of compulsory purchase, and the main sources of the current law. Readers are encouraged to refer back to that report for this material. It illustrates the derivation and scope of the principal compulsory purchase enactments (procedure and compensation) and how they have been construed judicially.
2.3 Before we do so, it is helpful to note the extent to which the law on compulsory purchase in its current state is unsatisfactory: a Study undertaken by the City University for the then DETR in 1997[2] found that 63% of owners were dissatisfied with the compulsory purchase process and that 60% found the experience to be stressful. It took an average of thirty months for acquiring authorities to reach the stage of deciding to make a compulsory purchase order and a further twenty months for the order to be confirmed. This was followed by widely varying periods from just under two years to seven years for authorities to reach the point of taking possession, with a further average wait of over two years for compensation claims to be settled.
2.4 The sources of the current law are most conveniently considered under separate heads:
(1) Powers of compulsory purchase;
(2) Making and authorisation;
(3) Implementation;
(4) Determination of compensation; and
(5) Compensation rules.
2.5 The vast majority of compulsory acquisitions are made under powers granted by numerous general Acts, for the purposes of functions of public authorities or utilities.[3] It is not part of our terms of reference to review these powers. The Government has announced its intention to supplement them by new powers which would:
enable local planning authorities to exercise compulsory purchase powers for a full range of planning and regeneration purposes, including halting the physical, economic and/or social deterioration of an area.[4]
2.6 Until recently it was common practice for transport and other similar undertakings to promote Private or Local Bills to authorise particular projects.[5] However, their use has become less important, since the 1992 Act enabled compulsory powers to be obtained without recourse to Parliament in most cases.
2.7 There appear to be no detailed, up to date statistics of the numbers of orders promoted under different powers. The 1997 City University study for the DETR, showed an annual average of 255 orders over the preceding three and a half years, broken down between Housing, Planning, Local Roads, Trunk Roads and Motorways, and Public Utilities.[6] The figures relate solely to acquisition of land, as such. Thus, for example, the figures for public utilities do not include powers obtained for the acquisition of rights in land, such as wayleaves for electricity lines or easements for pipelines.[7]
2.8 The law relating to the making and confirmation of compulsory purchase orders is in the Acquisition Act, and regulations made under it.[8] The Act contains separate (but substantially similar) sets of rules for orders promoted respectively by ministerial and non-ministerial authorities. It contains special rules for particular categories of land, such as land of local authorities or statutory undertakers, National Trust land or commons. It also contains an exclusive procedure for court challenges to the validity of orders.
2.9 The procedure in outline is as follows:
(1) Authorisation of compulsory purchase is conferred by a compulsory purchase order, which is made by the acquiring authority and confirmed by the relevant Minister (“the confirming authority”).[9] The order must be in the prescribed form, including a description of the land by reference to a map, and a statement of the purpose for which the land is required.[10] Notices of the making of the order must be published in local newspapers, and served on owners and occupiers (other than tenants for less than a month).[11]
(2) All those served with, or entitled to service of, a notice (“statutory objectors”[12]) have the right to object or make representations within the time specified by the notice. Other objections or representations may be received by agreement with the acquiring authority or at the discretion of the confirming authority. Objections may be disregarded if they relate exclusively to issues of compensation.[13] A public inquiry or hearing must be held for objections by statutory objectors, but is discretionary in other cases.[14]
(3) After consideration of the objections, and the report of the inquiry or hearing, the order may be confirmed by the confirming authority, with or without modifications (but not, except by agreement, so as to extend the area of land taken).[15] Notices of confirmation must be published, and served as under (1).[16]
(4) There is a statutory right to challenge the order on legal grounds in the Courts within 6 weeks of publication of the notice of confirmation.[17] Otherwise, the validity of the order is immune from challenge in legal proceedings.[18]
2.11 In the result, there are two alternative ways by which an acquiring authority may secure title to land, once the Compulsory Purchase Order (CPO) has ministerial confirmation: by notice to treat and by vesting declaration:[19]
(1) The notice to treat procedure involves service of a statutory notice on each affected landowner to initiate the process of agreeing or determining compensation. Title does not pass to the authority until compensation has been settled, but the authority may take possession in the meantime by serving notice of entry.[20] The land is valued at the date of entry (or the date of determination of compensation if earlier) and interest runs from that date.
The purpose of service of notice to treat is threefold:
(a) To inform interested persons that the acquiring authority intends to proceed to exercise its powers of compulsory purchase for the subject land;
(b) To obtain particulars of the recipients’ interest in the land and of the compensation to be claimed; and
(c) To tell the relevant parties that the authority is willing to negotiate on the compensation “to be made for the damage which may be sustained by reason of the execution of the works.”[21]
The notice to treat route encompasses two separate stages. The purpose of notice of entry as the second stage (served after, or at the same time as, notice to treat) is:
(a)to give notice to the owner, lessee and occupier of subject land that the authority will be entering that land;
(b)to validate such entry at the end of the prescribed period, notwithstanding non-payment of compensation at that juncture; and
(c)to act as a preliminary step to enforcing entry by warrant if entry is then denied.[22]
(2) The more recent vesting declaration procedure enables the authority, after confirmation, to make a declaration, vesting in itself title and authorisation to enter after expiry of a defined period (not less than 28 days) from the service of a notice on those affected. Title passes on the date so fixed, whether or not compensation has been settled. [23]
The purpose of a vesting declaration is to short-circuit the lengthier process of notice to treat followed by notice of entry. Execution of a general vesting declaration is (after preliminary notice) a single-step process which vests title to subject land automatically in the acquiring authority without need for formal conveyance or investigation of title. The acquired interests convert into compensation rights, and right of entry is immediate against all interest holders except those with minor tenancies. We are given to understand that today the procedure is used extensively by acquiring authorities. It has the added advantage that it effects transfer of title where identifying ownership of land would otherwise be problematic.[24]
2.12 The 1965 Act and the Vesting Declarations Act also contain provisions enabling the owner of land partly included within an order, to compel the purchase of the whole.[25] These have been supplemented by provisions of the 1973 Act. [26]
2.13 The 1961 Act requires unresolved issues of compensation to be referred to the Lands Tribunal.[27] The constitution and jurisdiction of the Tribunal, and procedures before it, are governed by the Lands Tribunal Act 1949, and rules made under it.[28]
(1) the 1961 Act;
(2) the 1965 Act;[29]
(3) the 1973 Act;
(4) the Acquisition Act;
The relevant provisions are discussed in detail in the Compensation Report.
[1]Compensation Report, Part II, The Existing Law: The Historical Context.
[2]The Operation of Compulsory Purchase Orders: Land Use, Minerals, Land Instability and Waste Planning Research Programme (DETR, December 1997) para 4.84. This was a detailed study of the system of compulsory purchase, commissioned by DETR from the City University Business School. It is probably the most comprehensive and authoritative modern account of the workings of the system in practice.
[3]A list of statutes conferring compulsory powers, taken from Butterworths, Division B, Chapter 1.F, is reproduced as Appendix 2 to the Compensation Report.
[4]Policy Statement, p 13, para 2.10; Policy Response Document, para 7.
[5]For example: the Channel Tunnel Act 1987, the London Underground (Victoria) Act 1991, the London Docklands Railway Act 1991, the Croydon Tramlink Act 1994.
[6]The Operation of Compulsory Purchase Orders, para 1.21. The figures show the following annual average proportions, based on the annual average of 255 orders, between the categories: Housing (86); Planning (58); Local Roads (94); Trunk Roads and Motorways (13); and Public Utilities (3).
[7]Ibid, para 1.5. CPPRAG commented on the “inconsistencies caused by the wide variations in the powers available to the different suppliers” and recommended further work to standardise them: op cit, paras 209, 218.
[8]Compulsory Purchase of Land Regulations 1994, SI 1994 No 2145. Procedure at inquiries held under the Act is governed by rules made under the Tribunals and Inquiries Act 1971; see e.g. the Compulsory Purchase by Non-Ministerial Acquiring Authorities (Inquiries Procedure) Rules 1990, SI 1990 No 512.
[9]Acquisition Act, s 2. Ministerial orders follow a similar procedure, save that (instead of being “made” and then “confirmed”), they are initially “prepared in draft” and then (following publication and objections) “made”: ibid, Schedule 1, para 1.
[10]The standard prescribed form is Form 1 in the Schedule to Compulsory Purchase of Land Regulations 1994, SI 1994, No 2154 (as amended by SI 1996, No 1008).
[11]Acquisition Act, ss 11, 12. Publication of the notice of making is the second prescribed step in the compulsory purchase process. Resolution to make an order is not governed by the compulsory purchase legislation, but the form in which the order is made is prescribed in the Compulsory Purchase of Land Regulations 1994. In the Compensation Report, we take the date of publication of notice of making as “the first notice date”. This date is the proposed starting date for compensation payment: see Part III, para 3.8 and Part IV, para 4.65.
[12]The term “statutory objector” is not used in the Acquisition Act itself. The term appears in the Compulsory Purchase by Non-Ministerial Acquiring Authorities (Inquiries Procedure) Rules 1990, defined as “any objector to whom the Secretary of State is obliged by virtue of section 13(2) [of the Acquisition Act] to afford an opportunity to be heard”: see SI 1990 No 512 r 2. In effect, “statutory objector” status is given to any person who is entitled, by virtue of his interest or right over the land, to notice of the making of the order under section 12 of the Acquisition Act, and makes an objection in accordance with the notice.
[13]Ibid, s 13(4).
[14]Ibid, ss 13(2), 13(3).
[15]Ibid, ss 13, 14.
[16]Ibid, s 15.
[17]Ibid, s 23.
[18]Ibid, s 25.
[19]The Policy Statement has accepted the CPPRAG recommendation that, in the interests of flexibility, both procedures should be retained: Policy Statement, App, para 2.28.
[20]1965 Act, s 11(1).
[21]1965 Act, s 5(1),(2).
[22]1965 Act, s13(1). See Part VII, para 7.27 below.
[23]Vesting Declarations Act, s 4.
[24]See Barry Denyer-Green, Compulsory Purchase and Compensation (6th ed, 2000), p 96.
[25]1965 Act, s 8; Vesting Declarations Act, s 12 and Schedule 1, para 2.
[26]1973 Act, s 53ff.
[27]1961 Act, s 1.
[28]See Lands Tribunal Rules 1996, SI 1996 No 1022.
[29]Or, where it applies, the equivalent provisions of the 1845 Act (ss 63, 68, 121).