BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
The Law Commission |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> The Law Commission >> LAND, VALUATION AND HOUSING TRIBUNALS (A Consultation Paper) [2002] EWLC 170(1) (12 December 2002) URL: http://www.bailii.org/ew/other/EWLC/2002/170(1).html Cite as: [2002] EWLC 170(1) |
[New search] [Help]
Part I
Introduction
1.1 On 18 May 2000 the Lord Chancellor appointed Sir Andrew Leggatt to undertake a review of tribunals. The report of the review was published on 16 August 2001.[1] The key recommendation of the report was that there should be a single tribunals service under the administrative control of the Lord Chancellor’s Department. A consultation paper about the Leggatt Review report was also issued by the Lord Chancellor’s Department in August 2001.
1.2 The Leggatt Review noted that, in the context of land, property and housing tribunals “[t]here are confusing overlaps of jurisdiction between courts and tribunals, as well as between tribunals” and that “an expert decision-making forum, without overlapping jurisdictions, is a precondition of effective procedural reform”.[2] The Review therefore recommended that the Law Commission should be instructed to work out “a comprehensive solution”, with a view to removing these overlaps and the current scope for forum shopping. The matter was formally referred to us on 8 November 2002.
1.3 Our terms of reference are as follows.
“In the context provided for the future of tribunals by the report of the Leggatt Review of Tribunals[3] and the Modernising Tribunals programme, to review the law relating to the tribunals listed below, including their procedures and composition, and in particular the relationship between the jurisdictions of those tribunals and of the courts or other tribunals, with the aim of making recommendations to ensure that the objectives of the Leggatt Review, as identified in its terms of reference[4], are met in relation to the work of those tribunals.
The tribunals are as follows:
(1) the Agricultural Lands Tribunal,[5]
(2) the Commons Commissioners,
(3) the Lands Tribunal,
(4) the Leasehold Valuation Tribunal,5
(5) the Rent Assessment Committees,5
(6) the Rent Tribunal,5
(7) the Valuation Tribunal,5 and
(8) such other related tribunals as the Law Commission and the Lord Chancellor’s Department may agree.”
1.5 It will be noted that the terms of reference refer only to tribunals in England. Consideration of tribunals in Wales is therefore outside of our terms of reference. The administration of five of the seven land, valuation and housing tribunals has been transferred to the National Assembly for Wales.[6]
1.10 In Part III we seek to identify the need for reform.
1.11 In Part IV we present our three suggested options for structural reform.
1.12 In Part V we consider the question of jurisdictional overlaps.
1.13 In Part VI we discuss the way forward.
[1]Report of the Review of Tribunals by Sir Andrew Leggatt: Tribunals for Users – One System, One Service (August 2001), (“the Leggatt Review”).
[2]Leggatt Review, para 3.30.
[3]Tribunals for Users: One System, One Service (2001). (footnote in original).
[4]The terms of reference were “To review the delivery of justice through tribunals other than ordinary courts of law, constituted under an Act of Parliament by a Minister of the Crown or for the purposes of a Minister’s functions; in resolving disputes, whether between citizens and the state, or between other parties, to ensure that:
There are fair, timely, proportionate and effective arrangements for handling those disputes, within an effective framework for decision-making which encourages the systematic development of the area of law concerned, and which forms a coherent structure, together with the superior courts, for the delivery of administrative justice;
The administrative and practical arrangements for supporting those decision-making procedures meet the requirements of the European Convention on Human Rights for independence and impartiality;
There are adequate arrangements for improving people’s knowledge and understanding of their rights and responsibilities in relation to such disputes, and that tribunals and other bodies function in a way which makes those rights and responsibilities a reality;
The arrangements for the funding and management of tribunals and other bodies by Government departments are efficient, effective and economical; and pay due regard both to judicial independence, and to ministerial responsibility for the administration of public funds;
Performance standards for tribunals are coherent, consistent, and public; and effective measures for monitoring and enforcing those standards are established; and
Tribunals overall constitute a coherent structure for the delivery of administrative justice.
The review may examine, insofar as it considers it necessary, administrative and regulatory bodies which also make judicial decisions as part of their functions.” (footnote in original).
[5] The review will not cover these tribunals in so far as they operate in Wales. (footnote in original).
[6]The devolved tribunals are the Leasehold Valuation Tribunal, the Rent Assessment Committee, the Rent Tribunal, the Agricultural Land Tribunal and the Valuation Tribunal. The Lands Tribunal and the Commons Commissioners are not devolved.