BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

The Law Commission


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> The Law Commission >> Land, Valuation And Housing Tribunals: The Future (Report) [2003] EWLC 281 (15 September 2003)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ew/other/EWLC/2003/281.html
Cite as: [2003] EWLC 281

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


    The Law Commission

    (LAW COM No 281)

    LAND, VALUATION AND HOUSING TRIBUNALS: THE FUTURE

    Report on a reference under section 3(1)(e) of the Law

    Commissions Act 1965

    Presented to the Parliament of the United Kingdom by the Lord High Chancellor

    by Command of Her Majesty

    September 2003
    Cm 5948

    The Law Commission was set up by the Law Commissions Act 1965 for the purpose of promoting the reform of the law.

    The Law Commissioners are:

    The Honourable Mr Justice Toulson, Chairman
    Professor Hugh Beale QC
    Mr Stuart Bridge
    Professor Martin Partington CBE
    Judge Alan Wilkie QC

    The Chief Executive of the Law Commission is Mr Michael Sayers and its offices

    are at Conquest House, 37-38 John Street, Theobalds Road, London WC1N 2BQ.

    The terms of this report were agreed on 30 July 2003.

    The text of this report is available on the Internet at:

    http://www.lawcom.gov.uk

    CONTENTS

      Paragraph
    SUMMARY SUMMARY
    PART I: INTRODUCTION  
    Background to the report 1.1
    The unified Tribunals Service 1.5
    Content of the report 1.8
    Abbreviations used in the report 1.14
       
    PART II: OUR RECOMMENDATIONS  
    Purpose of this part 2.1
    Recommendations for structural reform 2.3
         A reformed structure for land, valuation and housing tribunals 2.4
         Operation of the reformed tribunals 2.15
    Further recommendations 2.28
       
    PART III: THE CASE FOR REFORM: THE LEGGATT  
    REPORT  
    Introduction 3.1
    The project tribunals 3.2
         Adjudicator to HM Land Registry 3.6
         Agricultural Land Tribunal 3.8
         Commons Commissioners 3.9
         Lands Tribunal 3.10
         Tribunals within the Residential Property Tribunal Service 3.11
         Valuation Tribunal 3.15
    The Leggatt principles 3.16
         Independence 3.21
         Coherence 3.24
         User-friendliness 3.27
    The way forward 3.28
       
    PART IV: A REFORMED STRUCTURE FOR LAND, VALUATIOND HOUSING TRIBUNALS  
    Introduction 4.1
    The way forward: a unified tribunal structure  
         Changes to the consultation paper options 4.6
         The overall structure 4.13
         Advantages of the proposed structure 4.19
    The Property and Valuation Tribunal Jurisdictions of the PVT 4.26
         Operation of the Valuation Tribunals 4.32
         Appeals from the PVT 4.37
    Reformed Lands Tribunal Jurisdictions of the reformed Lands Tribunal 4.38
         Appeals from the reformed Lands Tribunal 4.57
    Appeals from the PVT to the reformed Lands Tribunal 4.62
         The permission requirement 4.63
         Basis of appeals 4.66
         Powers of the reformed Lands Tribunal on appeal 4.75
    Judicial review 4.77
    Referrals to the courts 4.81
         The statutory provisions 4.82
         Reasons for referral 4.86
    Ministerial responsibility 4.92
    Implications of the new structure for Wales 4.95
       
    PART V: OPERATION OF THE REFORMED TRIBUNALS  
    Introduction 5.1
    Regional structure 5.2
    Members and staff 5.5
         Presidents and Regional Chairs 5.9
         Members 5.15
         The registrar and deputy registrars 5.30
         Administrative staff 5.34
    Tribunal rules 5.37
         A common procedural code 5.39
         Case allocation 5.47
         Case transfer 5.55
         Alternative Dispute Resolution 5.61
         Fees and costs 5.65
         Enforcement powers 5.69
       
    PART VI: JURISDICTIONAL ISSUES  
    Introduction 6.1
    Individual areas of jurisdictional overlap 6.4
         Leasehold Valuation Tribunal 6.5
         Rent Assessment Committee 6.30
         Rent Tribunal 6.33
         Lands Tribunal 6.34
         Adjudicator to HM Land Registry 6.44
         Agricultural Land Tribunal 6.51
         Valuation Tribunal 6.55
    Action on jurisdictional overlaps General conclusions 6.57
         Case management powers 6.59
         The role of a unified tribunals system 6.66
    Housing disputes in the Leasehold Valuation Tribunal and in  
         the courts 6.67
       
    PART VII: A LEGISLATIVE MODEL  
    Introduction 7.1
    Council on Tribunals guidelines 7.5
         Primary legislation 7.8
         Secondary legislation 7.10
    The project tribunals 7.11
         Lands Tribunal 7.12
         Commons Commissioners 7.13
         Adjudicator to HM Land Registry 7.14
         RPTS Tribunals 7.15
         Agricultural Land Tribunal 7.16
         Valuation Tribunal 7.17
    The Appeals Service legislation 7.19
         Primary legislation 7.21
         Secondary legislation 7.31
         The Appeals Service legislation as a model 7.38
    Legislation for our proposed scheme 7.41
         Primary legislation 7.42
         Secondary legislation 7.43
         Non-statutory rules 7.44
       
       
    APPENDIX A: CURRENT STRUCTURE OF THE LAND, HOUSING AND VALUATION TRIBUNALS APPENDIX A
       
    APPENDIX B: PROPOSED STRUCTURE APPENDIX B
       
    APPENDIX C: LIST OF PEOPLE AND ORGANISATIONS WHO COMMENTED ON CONSULTATION PAPER NO 170 APPENDIX C
       
    APPENDIX D: ADVISORY GROUP MEMBERS APPENDIX D


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ew/other/EWLC/2003/281.html