BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[New search]
[Printable RTF version]
[Help]
Roches Stores Limerick Ltd/ Peter Mark [1993] IECA 129 (13th October, 1993)
COMPETITION
AUTHORITY
Competition
Authority Decision of 13 October 1993 relating to a proceeding under Section 4
of the Competition Act, 1991.
Notification
No CA/1021/92E - Roches Stores Limerick Ltd./ Peter Mark
Decision
No: 129
Price £0.30
£0.70 incl. postage
Notification
No CA/1021/92E -Roches Stores Limerick Limited/ Peter Mark
Decision
No: 129
Introduction
1. Notification
was made on 30 September, l992 by Peter Mark with a request for a certificate
under Section 4(4) of The Competition Act, l99l or, in the event of a refusal
by The Competition Authority to issue a certificate, a licence under Section
4(2), in respect of a lease between Roches Stores Limerick Ltd and Peter Mark.
The
Facts
(a) The
subject of the notification
2. The
notification concerns the lease of a premises at Unit 9, Corrib Shopping
Centre, Galway between Roches Stores Limerick Limited as landlord and Peter
Mark as tenant.
(b) The
parties involved
3. Roches
Stores Limerick Limited is a property owning company of the Roches Stores chain
and is engaged in the letting of shop units at the Corrib Shopping Centre.
Peter Mark is engaged in the business of hairdressing with 48 outlets in the
State including the salon at Corrib Shopping Centre.
(c) The
subject of the notification
4. The
shopping centre lease notified is in draft form and covers a term of 30 years
from 1 May 1991. The restricted user clauses in the lease are as follows:-
(a) Under
clause 4.11.2 the tenant covenants with the landlord
"Not
without the prior consent in writing of the Landlord or its Agency thereunto
lawfully authorised to use or to permit or suffer or allow the Demised Premises
or any part or parts thereof to be used for any purposes other than as a retail
shop for the Permitted business and for no other purpose or purposes whatsoever
..................
(b) Under
Clause l "the Permitted Business" is defined as
"The
retail trade or business of Ladies & Gents Hairdressing Salon, and for the
sale of beauty products and for carrying out beauty treatment including sunray
treatment and as a Solarium."
(c) In
Clause 4.25.1 the tenant covenants with the landlord:-
"Not
to assign, transfer, underlet, charge, mortgage, encumber, hold on trust for
another or part with the possession or occupation of the Demised Premises or
any part thereof or suffer any person to occupy the Demised Premises or any
part thereof as a Licensee or as concessionaire
BUT
SO THAT NOTWITHSTANDING
the foregoing the Landlord shall not unreasonably withhold its consent to an
assignment, transfer under-letting, charging, mortgaging or encumbering of the
entire of the Demised Premises ......".
(d) By
way of side letter dated 19 March 1992 the Landlord has indicated
"......it
is Roches' policy that no one trade should be over represented in the centre
and that where possible only a single shop unit in the centre should be used
for any specific trade or service with the exception of fashion......."
In
addition there are a number of other standard restrictive covenants and
obligations in the lease.
Assessment
- The Applicability of Section 4 (1)
5. The
Authority considers that Roches Stores Limerick Limited and Peter Mark are
undertakings and that the notified lease is an agreement between undertakings.
The agreement has effect within the State.
6. The
Authority considers that the notified agreement, and its restricted and
exclusive user clauses, and the other standard restrictive clauses and
obligations, does not have the object or effect of preventing, restricting or
distorting competition in trade in any goods or services in the State or in any
part of the State, for the reasons given in the Notice of the Authority of 2
September 1993 in respect of shopping centre leases (Iris Oifigiuil 10
September 1993 pp.665-667). The Authority therefore considers that the
notified agreement between Roches Stores Limerick Limited and Peter Mark does
not offend against Section 4 (1) of the Competition Act l99l.
The
Certificate
7. The
Competition Authority has issued the following Certificate.
The
Competition Authority certifies that in its opinion, on the basis of the facts
in its possession, the agreement between Roches Stores Limerick Limited and
Peter Mark in relation to the lease of a premises in Corrib Shopping Centre,
Galway, notified under Section 7 on 30 September 1992 (notification no.
CA/1021/92E), does not offend against Section 4 (1) of the Competition Act, l99l.
For
the Competition Authority
Des
Wall
Member
13
October 1993
© 1993 Irish Competition Authority
BAILII:
Copyright Policy |
Disclaimers |
Privacy Policy |
Feedback |
Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IECompA/1993/129.html