BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Irish Competition Authority Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Irish Competition Authority Decisions >> Airspace Investments Ltd/The Square; Management Ltd/5 Tenants of the Square Towncentre, Tallaght [1993] IECA 210 (3rd December, 1993)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IECompA/1993/210.html
Cite as: [1993] IECA 210

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


Airspace Investments Ltd/The Square; Management Ltd/5 Tenants of the Square Towncentre, Tallaght [1993] IECA 210 (3rd December, 1993)

Notification No: CA/874/92 - Airspace Investments Ltd/The Square Management Ltd/5 Tenants of The Square, Towncentre, Tallaght.

Decision No: 210.

Introduction

1. Notification was made by Airspace Investments Limited on 30 September, l992 with a request for a certificate under Section 4(4) of the Competition Act, l99l or, in the event of a refusal by the Competition Authority to issue a certificate, a licence under Section 4(2) in respect of leases between Airspace Investments Ltd, and the tenants of 5 shop units.

The Facts

(a) Subject of the notification

2. The notification concerns the leases relating to units 128, 209, 223, 231 and 235A in The Square, Towncentre, Tallaght, Dublin 24 between The Square Management Ltd, as the Freeholder, Airspace Investments Ltd as landlord, and the tenants of the units.

(b) The parties involved

3. The Square Management Ltd is the freeholder (and owner) of The Square, Towncentre, Tallaght, Dublin 24. Airspace Investments Ltd is the landlord of some units in the shopping centre. The 5 tenants are engaged in various retail and service activities at the centre.

(c) The notified arrangements

4. The standard shopping centre lease notified contains the following restricted user clauses viz.

(a) Under clause 3.2(3) the tenant covenants with the landlord and the Freeholder "Not, without the prior consent in writing of the Landlord and the Freeholder or their respective Agents thereunto lawfully authorised, to use or permit or suffer to allow the Demised Premises or any part thereof, to be used for any purpose other than PROVIDED ALWAYS AND IT IS HEREBY AGREED AND DECLARED that upon any application by the Tenant, or any Undertenant of the Tenant, for liberty to alter or change the aforesaid permitted use of the Demised Premises the Landlord and the Freeholder shall not unreasonably withhold their consent..."

(b) Under clause 3.2(5) the tenant covenants with the Landlord and the Freeholder "Not to assign transfer, underlet, mortgage, charge or part with the possession or occupation of the Demised Premises or any part thereof or suffer any person to occupy the Demised Premises or any part thereof as a licensee or concessionaire except with the previous consent in writing of the Landlord and the Freeholder BUT SO THAT NOTWITHSTANDING the foregoing the Landlord and the Freeholder shall not unreasonably withhold its consent..."

In addition, there are a number of other standard restrictive covenants and obligations in the lease.

5. Airspace Investments have furnished details of the permitted user under clause 3.2(3) attaching to each of the 5 leases whereby each tenant is restricted to particular specified retail or service activities. Details of the exclusive user attaching to each of 3 leases have also been supplied.

Assessment - The Applicability of Section 4(1)

6. The Authority considers that Airspace Investments Ltd, The Square Management Ltd and their tenants are undertakings and that the notified leases are agreements between undertakings. The agreements have effect within the State.

7. The Authority considers that the notified agreements, and their restricted and exclusive user clauses and the other standard restrictive clauses and obligations, do not have the object or effect of preventing, restricting or distorting competition in trade in any goods or services in the State or in any part of the State, for the reasons given in the Notice of the Authority of 2 September, l993, pp. 665-667). In fact, in this case, the arrangements provide for the location of competing outlets in the centre so no question of a restriction on competition arises. The Authority therefore considers that the notified agreements between The Square Management Ltd, Airspace Investments Ltd and the tenants do not offend against section 4(1) of the Competition Act, l99l.

The Certificate

8. The Competition Authority has issued the following certificate:

The Competition Authority certifies that in its opinion, on the basis of the facts in its possession, the agreements between The Square Management Ltd, Airspace Investments Ltd., and their tenants in relation to the lease of premises at The Square, Towncentre, Tallaght, Dublin 24, notified under Section 7 on 30 September, l992 (notification no. CA/874/92), do not offend against Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, l99l.



For the Competition Authority


Des Wall
Member
3 December 1993


© 1993 Irish Competition Authority


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IECompA/1993/210.html