BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Irish Competition Authority Decisions
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Irish Competition Authority Decisions >> Cantrell & Cochrane (Dublin) Ltd./ Pepsi Co. Inc. [2001] IECA 588 (16th May, 2001)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IECompA/2001/588.html
Cite as: [2001] IECA 588

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]

Cantrell & Cochrane (Dublin) Ltd./ Pepsi Co. Inc. [2001] IECA 588 (16th May, 2001)

Competition Authority
Competition Authority Decision of 16 May 2001 relating to a proceeding under Section 4 of
the Competition Act, 1991
Notification No. CA/305/92E - Cantrell & Cochrane (Dublin) Ltd. / Pepsi Co. Inc.
Decision No. 588
Price £0.20, €0.25
£0.60, €0.76 incl. postage
Competition Authority Decision of 16 May, 2001 relating to a proceeding under Section 4
of the Competition Act, 1991
Notification No. CA/305/92E - Cantrell & Cochrane (Dublin) Ltd. / Pepsi Co. Inc.
Decision No: 588
Introduction
1 Notification was made by Cantrell & Cochrane (Dublin) Ltd (C&C) on 30 September
1992 with a request for a certificate under Section 4(4) of the Competition Act, 1991, or in the
event of a refusal by the Competition Authority to issue a certificate, a licence under Section 4(2)
in respect of an agreement whereby Pepsi Co. Inc. appointed C&C as its exclusive bottler, to
bottle, sell and distribute beverages under the trademarks Pepsi-Cola and Pepsi.
The Decision
2 The Competition Authority considers that, on the basis of the facts in its possession,
the bottling agreement (Notification No. CA/305/92E) between Cantrell & Cochrane
(Dublin) Ltd and Pepsi Co. Inc. expired in 1999. The Agreement in question was in existence
at the time the Competition Act, 1991 came into force. The Authority has set out in Decision

1. No. 527 its reasons for concluding that where such an agreement has terminated, a decision

to issue or not to issue a certificate is of limited legal consequence and, by virtue of Section
7(3), no licence can now be awarded for the period during which the agreement operated.

2. The Authority has, therefore, decided to close the file without considering whether or not the

agreement merits a certificate or licence
For the Competition Authority
Paul Gorecki
Member
16 May 2001.

© 2001 Irish Competition Authority

BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IECompA/2001/588.html