BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Supreme Court of Ireland Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Supreme Court of Ireland Decisions >> Ni Eili v. Environmental Protection Agency [2000] IESC 42 (21st January, 2000) URL: http://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IESC/2000/42.html Cite as: [2000] IESC 42 |
[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]
1. The
Court has already given judgment in this matter and adjourned the question of
costs until today. Mr. Gleeson on behalf of Roche Ireland Limited and Mr.
Collins on behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency have sought an Order
for the costs of the appeal. Mr. Gaffney on behalf of the Appellant made an
application to this Court for an Order setting aside the ward of costs in the
Order made by Mr. Justice Lavan, has applied that there should be no costs
awarded in respect of the hearing of the appeal and thirdly, with regard to the
decision of the learned trial judge to refuse the application it made for costs
under the
2. Attorney
General’s Scheme, that this Court should now award him costs under the
Attorney General’s Scheme.
3. In
the first instance the Court would like it make quite clear that in its opinion
the provisions of the Attorney General’s Scheme does not apply in the
circumstances of this case and will certainly unhesitatingly refuse that
application.
4. On
the general question of costs the Court has given very serious consideration to
all the circumstances of the case, the ground of the application with regard to
the failure of the Environmental Protection Agency to specify in the licence
the ground upon which it was given and that it was the judgment of this Court
that that was adequate, the reasons being available in the other documents
referred to in the judgment. However, the Court fully appreciates the
seriousness of the issues raised by the Plaintiff and the submissions made by
Mr. Gaffney and it takes the view that in the particular circumstances of this
case, which is not to be regarded in any way as a precedent, that it would be
appropriate to do justice between the parties to make no Order as to costs in
this Court and set aside that portion of the Order of the learned trial judge
which awarded costs in the High Court to the Environmental Protection Agency
and Roche Ireland Limited and to make no Order as to the costs of the High Court.