BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Jersey Unreported Judgments |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Unreported Judgments >> Fenn v AG [2000] JRC 247 (14 December 2000) URL: http://www.bailii.org/je/cases/UR/2000/2000_247.html Cite as: [2000] JRC 247 |
[New search] [Help]
2000/247
3 pages
ROYAL COURT
(Samedi Division)
14th December, 2000
Before: Sir Philip Bailhache, Bailiff, and Jurats
Le Ruez and Le Breton
Jon Sebastian Fenn
-v-
The Attorney General
Magistrate's Court Appeal
Appeal against a total sentence, passed on 16th November, 2000, of 7 months' and 3 weeks' imprisonment, £200 fine or 7 days' imprisonment in default of payment following guilty pleas to the following counts:
1 count of criminally and fraudulently obtaining rent rebate by false pretences on which count a sentence of 5 months' imprisonment was passed.
1 count of illegal entry on which count a sentence of 1 month's imprisonment was passed consecutive to sentence of 5 months.
3 counts of theft, on each of which counts concurrent sentences of 1 month's imprisonment were passed concurrent with sentences of 1month's imprisonment, but consecutive to sentence of 5 months' imprisonment.
4 counts of possession of a controlled drug (cannabis resin) contrary to Article 6 (1) of the Misuse of Drugs
(Jersey) Law 1978, on 2 of which counts concurrent sentences of 1 week's imprisonment were passed, consecutive to sentences of 6 months'; and on 2 of which concurrent sentences of 2 weeks' imprisonment were passed, consecutive to sentence of 6 months' and 1 week's imprisonment.
1 count of exceeding parking time, on which count a fine of £20 or 7 days' imprisonment in default of payment was passed.
8 counts of parking without displaying parking card on each of which counts a fine of £20 or 7 days' imprisonment in default of payment was passed.
1 count of parking on the footway, on which count a fine of £20 or 7 days' imprisonment in default of payment was passed.
Breach of a 1 year Probation Order made in Magistrate Court on 11th February, 2000 on conviction of 2 counts of larceny on which charge a sentence of 1 month's imprisonment was passed, consecutive to sentence of 6 months' and 3 weeks' imprisonment was passed.
Appeal dismissed.
Advocate S.E. Fitz for the appellant
Advocate J. Martin on behalf of the Attorney General
JUDGMENT
THE BAILIFF:
1. This is an appeal by Jon Sebastian Fenn against the sentence of 7 months' and 3 weeks' imprisonment imposed by the Magistrate on 16th November, 2000, for various offences, the most serious of which was a fraud on the Housing Committee by obtaining rent rebate of £1,143 over a period of some 4 months for which offence he was sentenced to 5 months' imprisonment. The appellant has a bad record of convictions for offences including offences of dishonesty and relating to drug abuse. He has seven times been placed on probation and has breached those different orders on six occasions. Even while on bail for the fraud on the Housing Committee he committed further offences of larceny and possession of cannabis. He has been given numerous opportunities to reform himself but none has so far been taken.
2. Miss Fitz realistically accepted that the sentence could not be described as manifestly excessive. We would go further and say that the learned Magistrate approached the matter with evident care and imposed as lenient a sentence as was possible in all the circumstances. Miss Fitz really put the case to us on the basis of a plea for mercy. She drew our attention to a letter written by the appellant's mother which suggests that he has reached a turning point in his life. We hope that that may be so but in our judgement that is not in itself a sufficient reason to set aside a sentence properly imposed by the Magistrate. Many agencies are available to assist the appellant when he has served his sentence and we hope that he will take advantage of the offers for help that are available. The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
Authorities
Chevalier -v- A.G. (29th September, 1994) Jersey Unreported C.of A.