BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
Industrial Tribunals Northern Ireland Decisions |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Industrial Tribunals Northern Ireland Decisions >> Boyles v Ministry of Defence [2008] NIIT 432_08IT (18 November 2008) URL: http://www.bailii.org/nie/cases/NIIT/2008/00432.html Cite as: [2008] NIIT 432_08IT, [2008] NIIT 432_8IT |
||
[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]
CLAIMANT: Stephen Boyles
The decision of the industrial tribunal is that it does not have jurisdiction to hear this claim, because:-
the claimant did not have part-time service in the Royal Irish Regiment Home Service on or after 1 July 2000 and therefore did not satisfy the pre-condition for a valid claim under the Part-time Workers (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2000; and
he did not present his claim within the time-limit laid down by Regulation 8 of the above Regulations and it is not just and equitable, in all the circumstances of the case, for the tribunal to consider the complaint.
Constitution of Tribunal:
Chairman (sitting alone): Mr D Buchanan
The respondent was represented by Ms S Bradley, Barrister-at-Law, instructed by The Treasury Solicitor’s Office.
This matter was listed for a pre-hearing review to consider the following issues:-
“(i) Whether the claimant had part-time service in the Royal Irish Regiment Home Service on or after 1 July 2000 and therefore satisfied the pre-condition for a valid claim under the Part-time Workers (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2000.
(ii) Whether the claimant has presented his claim to an industrial tribunal within the time specified by Regulation 8 of the Part-time Workers (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2000, and if not, whether in all the circumstances of the case it is just and equitable for the tribunal to consider the complaint”.
The claimant did not appear. Notice of Hearing was sent to him on 10 September 2008. It was not returned to the Office of the Tribunals. I decided to determine this matter in his absence, and in doing so, had regard to his claim form where appropriate.
I find the following facts:-
(i) His claim form was presented on 5 March 2008.
(ii) As all part-time soldiers in the Royal Irish Regiment Home Service left that service on or before 31 March 2007, the claim is clearly outside the enhanced six months time-limit laid down by Regulation 8 of the Part-time Workers (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2000.
(iii) In the absence of evidence from the claimant, and any relevant information in his claim form, there is no material before me on which I can consider exercising my discretion to extend the time for bringing his complaint, and I decline to do so.
This being so, the tribunal does not have jurisdiction to determine the claim.
Furthermore, I am satisfied from the oral evidence of Ms Fiona McCulloch, a Senior Executive Officer at the Army Personnel Centre in Glasgow, and from documentary records produced by her, that the claimant did not have any part-time service in the RIR on or after 1 July 2000.
For this reason also, the tribunal does not have jurisdiction to determine his complaint.
Chairman:
Date and place of hearing: 24 October 2008, Belfast
Date decision recorded in register and issued to parties:
00432-08IT
