BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Industrial Tribunals Northern Ireland Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Industrial Tribunals Northern Ireland Decisions >> Graham v Robert Raymond Cunningham [2016] NIIT 00318_16IT (04 March 2016)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/nie/cases/NIIT/2016/00318_16IT.html
Cite as: [2016] NIIT 318_16IT, [2016] NIIT 00318_16IT

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNALS

 

 

                                                                                                                 CASE REF: 318/16

 

 

 

CLAIMANT:              David Samuel Graham

 

           

RESPONDENT:      Robert Raymond Cunningham

 

 

Certificate of Correction

 

 

The Decision issued on 4 March 2016, included the following sentence: “The respondent was debarred from participating in the hearing because the respondent did not present a response within the relevant time-limit.” That sentence is inaccurate. (The respondent did present a timely response; he was not debarred from participating; and he did participate).

 

The following is substituted in place of that inaccurate sentence:

 

      “The respondent was self-represented”.

 

 

             

 

 

 

 

 

 

Employment Judge: _____________________________________

 

 

Date: _______________________________________________

THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNALS

 

 

CASE REF: 318/16

 

                                     

CLAIMANT:                David Samuel Graham

 

 

RESPONDENT:      Robert Raymond Cunningham

 

 

DECISION

 

 

The claimant’s redundancy pay claim against the respondent is well-founded and it is declared that the respondent is liable to make a redundancy payment of £4,538 to the claimant.

 

 

 

Constitution of the Tribunal:

 

Employment Judge (sitting alone):       Employment Judge Buggy

 

Appearances:

 

The claimant was represented by Mr Sean Doherty. Barrister-at-Law

 

The respondent was debarred from participating in the hearing because the respondent did not present a response within the relevant time-limit.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                                        CASE REF: 318/16

 

 

 

 

REASONS

 

  1. I announced my decision at the end of the hearing.  At the same time, I gave brief oral reasons for that decision.

 

  1. This Decision is based on the following information:

 

Gross weekly pay: £ 275

 

Net weekly pay: £ N/A

 

Number of actual completed years of service: 14

 

Age on date of dismissal: 46

 

Multiplier (for redundancy pay): 16.5

 

3.    I am satisfied that it is just and equitable that this employee should receive a redundancy payment.

 

  1. This is a relevant decision for the purposes of the Industrial Tribunals (Interest) Order (Northern Ireland) 1990.

 

 

 

Employment Judge: _________________________

 

 

Date and place of hearing: 4 March 2016, Belfast

 

 

Date decision recorded in register and issued to parties:

 


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/nie/cases/NIIT/2016/00318_16IT.html