BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
You are here:BAILII >>
Databases >>
Scottish Court of Session Decisions >>
Andrew Law v Alexander Law. [1553] Mor 2365 (13 July 1553)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1553/Mor0602365-001.html Cite as:
[1553] Mor 2365
The heir can have no part of the moveables (excepting heirship), unless he be willing to collate.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Anent the action pursued be A. against R. Law, his brother and his airs for intromitting and taking ane bairnes part of gear in hurt of the rest of the bairnes, he beand air and receivand his father's heritage, together with airship, without he had casten in his airship, with the rest of the bairnes' guids to be parted equally betwixt the bairnes. It was excepted be the said Robert, that he might justly have his bairnes part of guids, notwithstanding his airship; because, after his father's decease, there was an elder brother than he who was air to his father, and sua he fell his bairnes part of the guids be that reason. It was replyt againe be the said Alexander, That the elder brother died soon after his father's deceise, and was never servit nor enterit air to his father, nor never gat sasine of his lands nor receivit no airship, but died before ever the guids were divydit, and sua the said Robert was heir to his father and received his airship; whilk reply was admittit and given to the said Alexander's proofe, notwithstanding the said Robert his allegeance.
1554. April 24.—Ane burgess dieand and leivand behinde him sundrie sones, the eldest dieand unentered to his father's lands, the nixt sone entrand as air to his father shall have no bairns part of goods and his father's lands baith, notwithstanding he hade ane elder brother the time of his father's decease, whilk died non enterit as said is, whilk was practised betwixt Alexander Law and Robert Law.
Maitland, MS. p. 16. & 17.*** Balfour reports the same case:
Na peksoun succeidand as air to his father or predecessouris landis and airschip gudis, aucht and sould have ony part of ony remanent movabill gudis or geir quhilk pertenit to his father, or predecessour, the time of his deceis, except he wald cast in and confer his haill airschip gudis, with the rest of the said haill movabill gudis and geir altogidder, that equal partage might be maid thairof, betwix him and the rest of the bairnis.
