BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Laird of Dundas v Elphinston. [1582] Mor 11075 (00 November 1582)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1582/Mor2611075-270.html
Cite as: [1582] Mor 11075

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1582] Mor 11075      

Subject_1 PRESCRIPTION.
Subject_2 DIVISION IX.

Triennial Prescription.
Subject_3 SECT. II.

Summons of Error. - Warnings.

Laird of Dundas
v.
Elphinston

1582. November.
Case No. No 270.

The act relative to prescription of summonses of error restricted to services of retours.


Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

The Laird of Dundas pursued the Heir of Mr Nicol of Elphinston for reduction of a decreet given by the Sheriff of Edinburgh or Lothian, whereintill certain soumes grass of the lands of and other pendicles of the lands of were adjudged to appertain to the said Mr Nicol Elphinston, and his lands of partly by the decreet of the Sheriff, partly by cognition taken thereintill by an inquest, and the Sheriff's authority interponed thereto. It was alleged, That the Laird had no interest to pursue the summons, because of the act of Parliament made by King James VI. whereintill it was provided, that all summonses of error or inordinate process that are to be raised by any persons who think themselves hurt or prejudged, either by the determination of an inquest, or by process of the Sheriff, should pursue the same within the space of three years after the leading of the said process, as at more length is contained in the said act. The Lords, notwithstanding of the said allegeance, made upon the said act, gave process, and repelled the allegeance, and found, That the said act could not be extended to, nor yet meant of the decreets given by Sheriffs, but only was meant anent the service of retours.

Fol. Dic. v. 2. 119. Colvil, MS. p. 340.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1582/Mor2611075-270.html