BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> The Duke of Lennox v the Laird of Balfour. [1590] Mor 11147 (00 1590) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1590/Mor2611147-344.html Cite as: [1590] Mor 11147 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1590] Mor 11147
Subject_1 PRESCRIPTION.
Subject_2 DIVISION XII. Who Privileged against Prescription?
The Duke of Lennox
v.
the Laird of Balfour
1590 .
Case No.No 344.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
The Duke of Lennox having right from the King to an obligation made by Cardinal Beaton, anno 1545, to the Laird of Grange, treasurer for the time, bearing, That the Cardinal had borrowed 3000 crowns from the Treasurer, and obliged him to repay it; the Duke pursued the Laird of Balfour as only executor living to the Cardinal for the said sum. Excepted, That it was prescribed, 40 years bygone. Replied, That the act did not militate in this case, because, since the making of the obligation, the princes were almost ever minors, contra quos non currit præscriptio. Duplied, That this was præscriptio introducta a lege & statuto Parliamenti, and so behoved to take effect contra ipsos minores, and that they could have no privilege granted to them in this case. The Lords repelled the exception in præsentia regis, 1590.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting