 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> A v B. [1600] 2 Elchies 355 (00 January 1600) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1600/Elchies020355-026.html Cite as: [1600] 2 Elchies 355 |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1600] 2 Elchies 355
Subject_1 MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT.
A
v.
B
Case No.No. 26.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Eodem Die.
A retour in 1642 retouring the land to L.2. 6s. 8d. of both old and new extent and the feu duty the same, the Lords sustained the objection, that it was no evidence of old extent distinct from the feu-duty. Arniston first differed, but it appearing by the retour that they were kirk-lands, he also agreed, because these as he supposed had never been extended.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting