BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Watson v Tenants. [1603] Mor 2205 (00 February 1603) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1603/Mor0602205-057.html Cite as: [1603] Mor 2205 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1603] Mor 2205
Subject_1 CITATION.
Subject_2 SECT. XV. Citation in Declarator of Escheat.
Watson
v.
Tenants
1603 .February .
Case No.No 57.
The donatar to a rebel's liferent having obtained general declarator, the Lords found that he may warn tenants to remove without necessity of calling the rebel.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
A man in Aberdeen being put to the horn, his escheat and liferent is disponed to one Watson, who, after general declarator obtained by him, made warning to certain of the rebel's tenants to remove. They excepted, that no process should be granted, because they were tenants to the master, who was heritably infeft, and was not called. It was answered, That he being rebel, and, by his remaining year and day at the horn, the pursuer having obtained the gift of his liferent and declarator thereupon, in effect, he was his author, and so needed not to be called. The Lords repelled the exception, and found he needed not to call the rebel.——Thereafter Mr Robert Paip compeared, and alleged that the tenants of these lands could not be removed at the pursuer's instance, because the said Mr Robert was heritably infeft in the saids lands; and so the pursuer, not being infeft, could have no action for removing the tenants, or apprehending the possession of the said lands. It was answered, If any infeftment
the said Mr Robert had, it was granted by the rebel after his declarator; and so the donatar, having obtained declarator, could not be prejudged thereby. In respect whereof the Lords repelled the allegeance.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting