[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1610] Mor 11966
Subject_1 PROCESS. Subject_2 SECT. I. Libel. Kelbirnie v. Dick Date: 29 June 1610 Case No. No 3. Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy A particular declarator, being subsequent to a general, needs not to be put under continuation, albeit it consist in facto. Fol. Dic. v. 2. p. 178. Haddington, MS. No 1935.
Libel.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
A particular declarator, being subsequent to a general, needs not to be put under continuation, albeit it consist in facto.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting