BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Bruce v Bruce. [1610] Mor 15314 (7 July 1610)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1610/Mor3515314-197.html
Cite as: [1610] Mor 15314

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]

[1610] Mor 15314      
Subject_1 TACK.
Subject_2 SECT. XIV.

Tacit Relocation.

Bruce
 v.
Bruce

Date: 7 July 1610
Case No. No. 197.

Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

He who is in possession of lands by tack, or as Mailler, being pursued for a greater duty, if he except super tacita revocatione, and it be replied that his possession was interrupted by warning, the reply will not be found relevant, if three years have expired after the warning, without intenting removing upon it; albeit the Lords recently of before found a naked warning but summons raised within the three years to be an interruption betwixt Home and the Tenants of Nynewalls.

 Fol. Dic. v. 2. p. 427. Haddington MS. No. 1945.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     

BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1610/Mor3515314-197.html