BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> A. v B. [1618] Mor 6688 (4 March 1618)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1618/Mor1606688-111.html
Cite as: [1618] Mor 6688

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1618] Mor 6688      

Subject_1 IMPROBATION.
Subject_2 SECT. V.

In what cases Extracts sustained to satisfy production. - When condescendence of the writs called for is sufficient. - Transumpts.

A
v.
B

Date: 4 March 1618
Case No. No 111.

Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

It was alleged, That retours cannot be produced before the act of Parliament 1617, seeing they cannot be reduced conform to the act made by Ja. IV. Parl. 5th, cap. 57. The Lords repelled the allegeance, and declared they would rot extend the words of the said act, made anent reductions of retours, to improbation of them.

Auchinleck, MS. p. 93.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1618/Mor1606688-111.html