 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Lo. Huntly v Lo. Forbes. [1619] Mor 12449 (17 February 1619) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1619/Mor2912449-276.html Cite as: [1619] Mor 12449 |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1619] Mor 12449
Subject_1 PROOF.
Subject_2 DIVISION I. Allegeances how relevant to be proved.
Subject_3 SECT. XV. Other allegeances, how relevant to be proved.
Date: Lo Huntly
v.
Lo Forbes.
17 February 1619
Case No.No 276.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Found that it was probable by witnesses, that such a notary was Sheriff-clerk and in use to give sasines as Sheriff-clerk.
Fol. Dic. v. 2. p. 234. Kerse, MS fol. 77. *** A similar case is reported by Kerse, 15th July 1615, Douglas against Cheeslie, No 4. p 3092. voce Consuetude.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting