BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Bain v - . [1622] Mor 2187 (14 February 1622) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1622/Mor0502187-021.html Cite as: [1622] Mor 2187 |
[New search] [Contents list] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1622] Mor 2187
Subject_1 CITATION.
Subject_2 SECT. IV. Citation in Confirmations.
Date: Bain
v.
-
14 February 1622
Case No.No 21.
A commissary cannot decern an executor-dative ad omissa, except the principal executor be first cited.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In an action, pursued at the instance of one Bain as executor dative, decerned to certain omitted sums, left out of the defunct's principal confirmed testament, The Lords found the testament ad omissa, which was the pursuer's title and ground of his action, to be null, because the executors confirmed in the principal testament were not cited to the testament dative ad omissa specified by the edict, and that the said testament made no mention that they were warned thereto; and therefore the Lords found no process in that action upon the testament dative ad omissa.
Clerk, Gibson.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting