BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
Process against Sub-Tacksmen and Intromitters, with Subjects hypothecated. - What if caution or payment has been offered by the Intromitters, or if sufficiency has been left to answer the rent.
Hays v. Keith
Date: 3 Feb 1624 Case No. No 22.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
A donatar of single escheat, recovering by a special declarator the price of a tenant's corn from the intromitter, found liable to the landlord for the rent of that crop; and it was found that the landlord had his option to insist against his tenant, or the intromitter, or the donatar who received the price, and that none of them were entitled to the benefit of discussion.
