BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
You are here:BAILII >>
Databases >>
Scottish Court of Session Decisions >>
Elphinston v Marr. [1624] Mor 6685 (17 February 1624)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1624/Mor1606685-100.html Cite as:
[1624] Mor 6685
Who must satisfy Production. - What terms allowed for Production. What incumbent on the Defender. - What his Privileges.
Elphinston v. Marr
Date: 17 February 1624 Case No. No 100.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In my Lord Elphinston's improbation against the Earl of Marr, it was found that in calling for retours and services, the director of Chancery or the clerk to the process of the services should have been summoned.
Spottiswood, (Improbation.) p. 165.
* * * See Haddington and Durie's report of this case, voce Citation, No 79. p. 2217. and No 80. p. 2218.
