BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
You are here:BAILII >>
Databases >>
Scottish Court of Session Decisions >>
Watson v Lord Kinclevin. [1624] Mor 9127 (2 July 1624)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1624/Mor2209127-001.html Cite as:
[1624] Mor 9127
If parties called in a multiple-poinding were out of the country, the cause went on not-withstanding, but the party obtaining preference, was required to find caution to repeat.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In a double poinding, raised by certain tenants against one Watson a minister on the one part, and the Lord Kinclevin on the other, the Lord Kinclevin being out of the country the time of the citation, and not summoned upon threescore days, and therefore, it being alleged, that no process could be given against him, upon that summons; the Lords took this order, that in all the like cases of double poinding, and suspensions, where any of the parties therein are not in the country, and are not summoned upon threescore days, and so are not ready, but refuse to dispute upon their rights, that they will sustain the process, and discuss the rights of the parties compearing; with this provision, that the party who shall be decerned to be answered and obeyed, shall be bound, and find soverty to that effect, if need be, to refund what he shall recover by that sentence, to the party out of the country, if it shall be found that he has better right to that which is controverted, than the party who then in his absence is decerned to be answered.
Clerk, Hay.
Fol. Dic. v. 1. p. 593. Durie, p. 135.
