BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> M'Culloch v L. Merton. [1626] Mor 2703 (22 July 1626) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1626/Mor0702703-012.html Cite as: [1626] Mor 2703 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1626] Mor 2703
Subject_1 COMPETENT.
Subject_2 SECT. IV. Reduction of Services of Heirs.
Date: M'Culloch
v.
L Merton.
22 July 1626
Case No.No 12.
An exception in a declarator of bastardy was sustained, being founded on the service of an heir to the alleged bastard, which being a standing sentence, the Lords found sufficient to elide the gift, so long as it stood unreduced; and this was found, altho' the service was not retoured nor past the chancery, and although it should never be retoured, the person having died shortly after the service.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In an action of declarator of bastardy, at the instance of M'Culloch contra L. Merton, the Lords sustained an exception, founded upon the service of an heir to the alleged bastard, which service being a sentence standing, the Lords sustained as sufficient to elide the gift of bastardy, and to exclude the King's right, so long as the said service stands untaken away, and which the Lords so found, albeit the service was not retoured, nor past the chancellary; and which, albeit it should never be retoured, seeing the person served died shortly after the service; and so the pursuer alleged, that the said service not retoured ought not to elide this pursuit, the same being an imperfect and null writ, which would
never furnish action to him who was served, and which ought not to produce any benefit to him, and consequently ought not to furnish any argument in his favours against this pursuit; notwithstanding whereof the service was sustained, as said is. Act. Nicolson et Lawtie. Alt. Aiton, et Neilson. Clerk, Gibson.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting