BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Turnbull v Scot. [1626] Mor 13540 (25 November 1626)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1626/Mor3213540-009.html

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1626] Mor 13540      

Subject_1 REGISTRATION.

Turnbull
v.
Scot

Date: 25 November 1626
Case No. No 9.

As a formal discharge of a reversion must be registered, so must an obligation to grant a discharge.


Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

The Lords found, in an action betwixt Turnbull and Scot, a bond produced for verifying of a triply, admitted to Turnbull's probation, whereby the maker of the bond was obliged to discharge a reversion granted to him to be null, because it was not registered in the Clerk of Register's books, conform to the act of Parliament anno 1617, and therefore found the triply founded thereupon not to be proved; and this was found, notwithstanding that the pursuer alleged, That the act of Parliament foresaid extended not to bonds made for discharging of reversions, and there was not any mention made of such bonds in the said act, and the Lords could not extend the act of Parliament further than the very words thereof bore; notwithstanding of the which allegeance, the Lords found the same null, for not registration, as said is, because the act of litiscontestation found the allegeance founded upon a bond to discharge the reversion, to be as sufficient as a discharge thereof; and so as it was equivalent to a discharge, they found that it ought to be of the nature of a discharge in that point, which, without registration could not have been sustained; and this was found, being proponed not by him who made the bond, but by a third person, who had acquired the heritable right from the maker of the bond after the making thereof, and whom the Lords found to be a competent party, and to have sufficient interest to propone that nullity; albeit the pursuer alleged, That the act of Parliament admitted that to be proponed only by one who had a better right, in which case the proponer was not, whose right was after the pursuer's right and inhibition executed thereon, which was repelled, and the bond found null.

Act. Stuart. Act. Cunningham & Scot. Clerk, Gibson. Fol. Dic. v. 2. p. 330, 331. Durie, p. 236. *** Kerse reports this case:

Found, That a bond to discharge a reversion equivalent to the discharge of a reversion in prejudice tertæ personæ.

Kerse, MS. fol. 84.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1626/Mor3213540-009.html