BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Kirkwood v Inglis. [1627] Mor 12449 (16 November 1627)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1627/Mor2912449-278.html

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]

[1627] Mor 12449      
Subject_1 PROOF.
Subject_2 DIVISION I.

Allegeances how relevant to be proved.
Subject_3 SECT. XV.

Other allegeances, how relevant to be proved.

Kirkwood
 v.
Inglis

Date: 16 November 1627
Case No. No 278.

Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

If a summons be referred to be proved by writ or oath of party, the pursuer must condescend at the first term of probation which of the two ways he will choose.

 Auchinleck, MS. p. 152.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     

BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1627/Mor2912449-278.html