Scottish Court of Session Decisions
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Kirkwood v Inglis. [1627] Mor 12449 (16 November 1627)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1627/Mor2912449-278.html
|
|
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Kirkwood v Inglis. [1627] Mor 12449 (16 November 1627) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1627/Mor2912449-278.html |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Subject_1 PROOF.
Subject_2 DIVISION I. Allegeances how relevant to be proved.
Subject_3 SECT. XV. Other allegeances, how relevant to be proved.
Date: Kirkwood
v.
Inglis
16 November 1627
Case No.No 278.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
If a summons be referred to be proved by writ or oath of party, the pursuer must condescend at the first term of probation which of the two ways he will choose.
Auchinleck, MS. p. 152.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting