BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Campbell v Campbell. [1627] Mor 16246 (6 July 1627)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1627/Mor3716246-093.html
Cite as: [1627] Mor 16246

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1627] Mor 16246      

Subject_1 TUTOR - CURATOR - PUPIL.

Campbell
v.
Campbell

Date: 6 July 1627
Case No. No. 93.

Tutors testamentary were preferred to dative, altho' they had not begun to act for six years.


Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

In a suspension, Campbell against Campbell, the Lords preferred tutors testmentars nominate to a minor (whereof the Laird of Langshaw was one) to the tutor dative, in the administration of the minor's goods, notwithstanding that the tutor dative alleged, that he ought to have been preferred, seeing the tutors testamentars had fallen from their office, there being six years since the defunct's decease who nominated them tutors, during the which space they had done no diligence, neither to administrate the minor's affairs, nor to care for her person, as was incumbent on them of the law, until now that the tutor dative had intented this pursuit in favours of the minor; and that the said tutor dative having married the minor's mother, hath had the only care of her all this time; likeas as the said tutors testamentars were curators to the heir-male, who in this process was convened for that deed which he was obliged to fulfil to this pupil, so that they could not be both curators to the one party and tutors to the other; which allegeance was repelled, seeing they found, that this cessation of the tutors testamentars could not prejudge them of their office of tutory, which they were now willing to administrate, albeit after six years expired, in regard there was no prejudice sustained by the minor, nor done to her in the mean time, which could be qualified any ways; and although they were curators to the heir-male, who was charged to fulfrl the deed libelled for the pupil, to whom they were tutors, yet that was found no impediment to them to continue tutors, seeing the heir-male offered real and ready obedience, and to fulfil the obligation to the other pupil, so that it was no litigious dispute betwixt these parties, which could hinder the effect of the tutors, administration of their pupil's goods, and the testamentars were preferred to the dative. It is to be here considered, that of the law quamdiu speratur tutela testamentaria non est locus dativæ vel legitimæ, also Vitricus de jure non datur tutor suo privigno; and this tutor dative, before the tutory dative, had married the mother of this pupil, to whom he acclaimed to be tutor. Also the Lords found, that the Laird of Rowallan, who was father to the tutor dative, being one of the tutors testamentars, who having renounced to be tutor by his renunciation subscribed by him, and once produced before the Lords, albeit that thereafter he took up the same and desired to be admitted to the tutory with the rest of the testamentars, alleging that he might repent and return to the office; yet in respect of the said renunciation, the Lords found that he ought not to be tutor; but only the rest of the testamentars, and that he could not come back again.

Act. Hope. Alt. Scot. Clerk, Scot. Durie, p. 304.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1627/Mor3716246-093.html