BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> E. Roxburgh v L. Langtoun. [1628] Mor 379 (26 January 1628) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1628/Mor0100379-002.html Cite as: [1628] Mor 379 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1628] Mor 379
Subject_1 ART and PART.
Date: E Roxburgh
v.
L Langtoun.
26 January 1628
Case No.No 2.
One found liable in a spuilzie of teinds, because the corns were threshed in his barn, and he disposed of them.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In a spuilzie of teinds by the Earl of Roxburgh against the Laird of Langtoun and others, it being proven that the corns spuilzied were after the spuilziation casten in the L. Langtoun's barns, and were threshen there, and thereafter disponed off by him.——The Lords found this receipt, and using of the corns, to be a ratihabition; and consequently found the spuilzie proven against him, albeit he was not the actual spuilzier, but that others were proven to have actually committed the act of spuilziation.
Act. Nicolson. Alt. ——. Clerk, Hay.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting