BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
You are here:BAILII >>
Databases >>
Scottish Court of Session Decisions >>
Adie v Gray. [1628] Mor 9977 (26 January 1628)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1628/Mor2409977-001.html Cite as:
[1628] Mor 9977
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
An executor is empowered, virtute officii, to apply his intromissions for payment of the defuncts debts; and as he may pay primo venienti, so, if he himself be a creditor, he may of course retain for his own payment. It is true, an executor cannot safely pay without decree; but, as he cannot take a decree against himself, he must either be allowed to pay himself without decree, or not at all. And this was found in a case, where an executor, qua nearest of kin, had intermedled before confirmation, and was pursued as vitious intromitter; but having thereafter confirmed within the year, which purged the vitiosity, the confirmation was drawn back, and sustained to found the executor in his right of retention, equally as if he had been confirmed before intromission.
In the same cause the executor was allowed retention of a debt he had paid as cautioner for the defunct, before intenting of the above process against him.
But an executor was not allowed to exhaust the testament by debts, wherein he was cautioner for the defunct, unless he had made actual payment before being interpelled by other creditors; yet he was allowed to plead his claim of relief thus far, to come in pari passu with the creditors doing diligence against him.
Fol. Dic. v. 2. p. 50. Durie.
*** This case is No 193. p. 9866. voce Passive Title.
