Scottish Court of Session Decisions
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Bruce v Bruce. [1628] Mor 12397 (26 November 1628)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1628/Mor2912397-202.html
|
|
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Bruce v Bruce. [1628] Mor 12397 (26 November 1628) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1628/Mor2912397-202.html |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Subject_1 PROOF.
Subject_2 DIVISION I. Allegeances how relevant to be proved.
Subject_3 SECT. XI. Mandate, Order, Allowance, Tolerance, &c.
Date: Bruce
v.
Bruce
26 November 1628
Case No.No 202.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
That the pursuer of an ejection voluntarily removed and transported all the goods to another place, although there preceded no warning, was found relevant to he proved prout de jure.
Fol. Dic. v. 2. p. 229. Durie. *** This case is No 7. p. 3610. voce Ejection.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting