BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Cant v Edgar; [1629] 1 Brn 378 (18 March 1629) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1629/Brn010378-1014.html |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR GEORGE AUCHINLECK OF BALMANNO.
Subject_2 The following CASE, and those in the preceding pages, marked as taken from 2d MS. are not found in the MS. followed by Mr Morison, while printing in his Dictionary the Cases from Auchinleck referred to in the Folio Dictionary by Lord Kames.
Cant
v.
Edgar;
or,
Falconer
v.
Beattie
1629 .March 18 .1627 .December 12 .Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In an action pursued by Cant against Edgar, it was alleged by the defender, That the debt contained in his father's bond, which was heritable, and for the which he was pursued as heir to his father, by this pursuer, heir to the assignee, could not appertain to the assignee's heir, but to his executors; because, although the bond be heritable, yet the assignation made it moveable, and, consequently, to appertain to the executors. The Lords repelled the allegeance, and found that the assignation did not alter the nature of the bond.
2d MS. Page 10.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting
