BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Semple v Dobie. [1630] Mor 14688 (24 March 1630)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1630/Mor3314688-074.html

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1630] Mor 14688      

Subject_1 SOLIDUM ET PRO RATA.
Subject_2 SECT. XIV.

Executors how liable? - In a Process must they all concur, or have they Action pro rata?

Semple
v.
Dobie

Date: 24 March 1630
Case No. No. 74.

As one of several executors may be sued alone, if he has intromited with as much as will pay the debt, so may payment be made to one, of the whole debt, when the others have intromitted as far beyond their share.


Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

This is mentioned in the 17th of March, 1630, No. 75. p. 2739. voce Competent, where the payment alleged made to one of the two conjunct executors, was sustained to liberate from the whole; and that the other executrix, who acclaimed her own half of that debt alleged paid, could not seek any part thereof, nor oppone to that discharge, because she had intromitted with her own half of the whole goods, and with also much more, as the debt now paid to the other executor extended to, which allegeance was sustained to maintain the said payment and discharge; and it was not respected what the said executrix answered, that this was not pertinent to this debtor to allege, that an executor had intromitted with more than his own part, and more than the others; for that was proper to the executors among themselves to count thereon, and which they would do in their own competent time; but this not being alleged by theco-executor, it could not be proponed by the debtor; which was repelled, and the said allegeance sustained: For as an executor may be convened alone, where there are two or more executors, by the creditor for the whole debt, if he has intromitted with as much as may pay it, so may payment be made to one of the whole debt, where the other executor has intromitted with the like quantity more than his own part.

Fol. Dic. v. 2. p. 382. Durie, p. 514.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1630/Mor3314688-074.html