[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Hardie v M'Caula. [1631] Mor 2740 (22 January 1631) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1631/Mor0702740-076.html Cite as: [1631] Mor 2740 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1631] Mor 2740
Subject_1 COMPETENT.
Subject_2 SECT. XVIII. Challenge on the Head of Interdiction, how Proponable.
Date: Hardie
v.
M'Caula
22 January 1631
Case No.No 76.
Found incompetent to propone interdiction in a suspension, altho' the interdiction was known to the charger. But time was allowed to bring a reduction.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Hardie being charged to make payment of a sum in a bond, suspended, that he was interdicted the time of the making thereof, and done without the consent of the interdictors, whereupon he had reduction ready to be discussed, and which interdiction was also known to the charger, at the granting of the bond,
and before. The Lords found the letters orderly proceeded, notwithstanding of the interdiction, and the party's knowledge thereof, in respect of the bond standing unreduced; but suspended the execution of the sentence to a certain day assigned to the suspender to do diligence, to obtain his reduction discussed. Clerk, Hay.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting