BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Mr William Kerr v Forsyth of Dykes. [1635] 1 Brn 355 (11 February 1635) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1635/Brn010355-0944.html |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR GEORGE AUCHINLECK OF BALMANNO.
Date: Mr William Kerr
v.
Forsyth of Dykes
11 February 1635 Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Where a summons of improbation is only intented of a writ, containing no reduction or reasons of annulling the said writ, the Lords will not suffer the party, pursuer of the improbation, in case he succumb in the improbation, to object nullity against the said writ, taken to be improven; but suffered him to pass from the summons of improbation, and to libel a new summons upon the nullity.
Page 222.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting
