BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> William Montgomery v Theodore Montgomery. [1662] Mor 2715 (22 July 1662) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1662/Mor0702715-033.html Cite as: [1662] Mor 2715 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1662] Mor 2715
Subject_1 COMPETENT.
Subject_2 SECT. VI. Objections to Hornings, whether proponable by Exception.
Date: William Montgomery
v.
Theodore Montgomery
22 July 1662
Case No.No 33.
Found in conformity with No 28. p. 2713. and No 31. p. 2714.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
William Montgomery, as donatar to the escheat of Theodore Montgomery, pursues a general and special declarator in one libel, and insists, first, in the general.—The defender alleges absolvitor, because the horning is null, the denunciation being at the cross of Edinburgh, where the defender had not his domicile. The pursuer opponed the horning standing, bearing, the defender to dwell in Edinburgh, and the horning could not be taken away by exception, alibi, not instantly verified.
The Lords repelled the defence, but prejudice of reduction thereupon.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting